View Single Post
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 08-27-2008, 02:30 PM
Dusty Chalk's Avatar
Dusty Chalk Dusty Chalk is offline
Molly Medulla


no, not Johnny Cash, the other one
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: MD/DC/VA area
Posts: 9,942
Default Re: Kubrick, Spielberg, Cheese, Spoilers, and Spam

Quote:
Originally Posted by blessingx View Post
... is it really so complicated to see that the more sloppily the spoiler tag is applied to everything the less effective it is as a tool?
Yes. Of course if it's sloppily applied, then it's less effective as a tool. That's not the imperative -- the imperative is to use it well. If you phrase your sentence exactly opposite, you realize that we're agreeing -- if the spoiler tag is applied well, then it becomes more effective as a tool. Which is what I'm asking.

When it's used well, it seems fine to me. (cf. Dan's posts, for example -- completely readable).

(le sigh)

You're right -- we're repeating ourselves at this point. The difference is, you're the one "breaking the rules", so if you continue to be difficult about not using spoiler tags appropriately, then I'm in a small position to do something about it. Spoilering movies for others == being an asshat, our one rule.

EDIT: Not that you've really been difficult so far -- it was one little edit, and I've already been made clear that it, in itself, did not spoiler the movie. And discussing spoilering does not constitute being difficult either. I mean, you are being difficult, but not asshat difficult. Just whiny child difficult.

EDIT: And yeah, when my patience gets tested, I'm not a saint. Go figure.
__________________
Dirty Laundry Will Out.
In Russia, Fascism embraces you.
/)_/)
(^.^=)
(")"_)o
I remain,
:-Peter, aka :-Dusty :-(halk

Last edited by Dusty Chalk; 08-27-2008 at 02:40 PM.
Reply With Quote