people who don't bother to go outside to smoke smoke enough to destroy everything they own with cigarette smoke.
people who don't bother to go outside to smoke smoke enough to destroy everything they own with cigarette smoke.
It sounded to me more like the issue is that they smell like cigarettes and so they are a bio-hazard, and not that they are covered in tar and nicotine that caused them to fail. Maybe I read it wrong, and I agree with the "you break it, you pay for it" philosophy. But does smelling like a cigarette disqualify one from repairs?
I hate cigarettes, I have a lung disease that brings my oxygen levels to the high 80's, high 70's on a flight of stairs. I avoid smoke every chance I can. But I don't see why a smokey computer can't be fixed by a guy wearing a mask and gloves, or a bunny suit as we call them. It seems to me that it's more of that liberal green BS, that they are so special and above stooping to that level, so they rob the consumer of their rights.
The article said the computer had failed from "tar from cigarette smoke", that sounds like it got pretty gummed up. Not really surprising apple wouldn't repair something destroyed like that. That's not failure of their workmanship, but rather something killed by environmental factors.
I agree about the Liberal bullshit, but guess who would be suing in the future if they got cancer and didn't smoke? Not that I believe dealing with tar would result in that unless the exposure was huge, but you can see what I'm getting at. (I was a Health and Safety officer at a previous job and things were getting ridiculous, I must say.)
"The trouble with most people is not what they don't know, but what they know for certain that isn't true." -- Mark Twain
Mac → Audio-gd Reference 3+1 → Phoenix or Stax T1S → HD-800s, Magnums or 404LE, LNS
currawong.net | Twitter
Sweet mailbox, bro.
![]()
I love you. I am the milkman of human kindness. I will leave an extra pint.
AMEX | BD-UG1 Mac mini Blu-ray Drive Upgrade Kit
Is it for the asked price (199$ + tech work) still a good deal or the external Blu-Rays are the way to go?
Amicalement
you just planning to use it as a blu-ray burner?
speakers: shure m97xe → technics sl-1200mk2 → cambridge audio azur 540p → pioneer vsx-1018ah-k → b&w 685
portable: iphone → jh13 pro
I dont want to use it more than for it's playback option. My main concern is that I figure it could cost me around (even if I ignore all the trouble for buying hardware from the US) 300$. I would like at least buying a decent device and not a B grade stuff under the Apple sex appeal...
Thanks,
Amicalement from Québec
You can't do bluray playback on mac yet, to my knowledge.
"Blu-ray is just a bag of hurt. It's great to watch the movies, but the licensing of the tech is so complex, we're waiting till things settle down and Blu-ray takes off in the marketplace."
Apple's Steve Jobs calls Blu-ray "a bag of hurt" -- Engadget
no., they're just giving you the drive to use as mass storage.
As to the ability to move the data fast enough, no that's not a problem, it's all licensing
Again when something sound too good to be true it's probably not what you're looking for.
Thanks
I think I'll do the Dusty Colorware treatment instead...![]()
Sounds like Steve Jobs couldn't just steamroll the kind of licence for the technology he wants, as he usually does, so he hasn't bothered.
"The trouble with most people is not what they don't know, but what they know for certain that isn't true." -- Mark Twain
Mac → Audio-gd Reference 3+1 → Phoenix or Stax T1S → HD-800s, Magnums or 404LE, LNS
currawong.net | Twitter
Apple should probably just buy one of the major studios, that way they could compete with the Sheinhardt Wig Company.
"They aren't musicians as much as... ear rapists."
--Sarah Silverman