![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Donate | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Downloads | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Chat Room [3] |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Of course there isn't... what a silly thing to speculate about... honest...
__________________
Main rig: APL 3910 32bit -> No amp at all... (BHSE when ever it will be ready and a few DIY amps under way)Computer rig: Trends UD-10.1 -> AudioZone DAC -> Stax SRM-717 Headphones: Stax SR-Ω, SR-Ω w/SR-007 drivers, SR-007 and SR-1 |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
I'm considering buying a quad of extra tubes for rolling in anticipation of my BHSE. What characteristics do I look for - just a matched quad of EL34? A quick eBay search turned up these, any of them will do? Anyone know what will come stock with the BHSE?
Matched Quad of Tungsol EL34 B / 6CA7 tubes Tung sol - eBay (item 310100272607 end time Dec-13-08 08:25:18 PST) NOS Siemens EL34 Tubes Matched Quad (RFT, Telefunken) - eBay (item 150309740000 end time Nov-19-08 21:28:33 PST) EL34 EH -NEW Electro Harmonix Guitar AmpTubes 4 pc Quad - eBay (item 280286065168 end time Dec-16-08 00:02:15 PST)
__________________
http://www.head-case.org/forums/159456-post373.html |
|
||||
|
Any one of these will work and the BHSE will ship with the Mullard reproductions which are supposed to be one of the best new production tubes. I've only tried ones from the first production run and I liked the SED "Winged C" better but that's supposed to have changed now. You don't need a matched quad (only matched pairs) but the quad won't hurt.
I personally wouldn't pay that much for the RFT tubes since they are good but not miles better then the new stuff. The Mullard XF3's are much better let alone the XF2's and XF1's which are the golden standard. If you like big, bloated bass then the GE and Sylvania (Phillips later on) would do it for you but they don't work well with the Omegas.
__________________
Main rig: APL 3910 32bit -> No amp at all... (BHSE when ever it will be ready and a few DIY amps under way)Computer rig: Trends UD-10.1 -> AudioZone DAC -> Stax SRM-717 Headphones: Stax SR-Ω, SR-Ω w/SR-007 drivers, SR-007 and SR-1 |
|
||||
|
I'm beginning to think that the 007t---->O2 Mk2 combo just isn't doing it for me. I love the amp with my Lambdas. But I'm disappointed with the O2. I've been trying so hard to love the O2 mk2, but the magic doesn't see to be there. I don't know if this is an mk1 v. mk2 thing or the amp or what, but it is frustrating. Compared to my Signatures, the O2 mk2 does not have the same attack, nor does it seem to be as detailed. Maybe I just wasn't in the mood for it tonight. Regardless, I look forward to trying the O2 mk1 side-by-side at the NYC meet, and I also look forward to trying out some asskicking SS stat amps to see if what the mk2 needs is a swift kick in the pants.
Just when you think you've got the rig all set...
__________________
Welcome to Head-Case, sorry about the back of your head. |
|
||||
|
It's an O2 thing as far as I am concerned. They need more than the 007t or 717/727 can offer to sound even decent. They can sound good on the Woo GES, but not great. They can sound pretty great on the ES-1/2, but not fantastic. And they are probably taken to their greatest level by the KGBH/SE as far as I have heard them. I wonder if a really powerful amp, say my McCormack DNA 500 with massive wattage could power a Stax trafo box and make the O2s come to life a bit. Should have tried it with Gene's Accuphase in Tampa but I just forgot.
|
|
||||
|
I can't talk about the O2Mk2 because I've never heard a pair, but I had the chance at a meet to compare briefly my O2Mk1 out of a SRM-007tII and out of a SRD-7 Pro using Quad II monoblocks. The music on both setups was fed by a shiny Shanling CD player that seemed to be a very decent source.
The SRM-727 sounded way more polite than the SRD-7, making the sound less exciting. The level of details was excellent from what I remember, but I was put off by the unengaging sound. It reminded a bit of the SRM-T1S, in the sense that it sounds good, but doesn't get my foot tapping. Also, the volume of bass it provides isn't satifying enough considering what the O2 are capable of and the treble is too gentle. On the other end, the SRD-7 Pro setup sounded more in-your-face, very lush with slightly uncontrolled bass and rolled-off top end. It doesn't resolve the microdetails in the music which can be good for some genres, but it's well admitted that the transformer boxes are not the last word in term of resolution. The SRD-7 Pro/Mk2 really rocks with a good amp to say the least and I'm very happy with the SRD-7 Mk2/Cambridge 840A that I use right now. Also, from what I remember, the KGSS DX that I had sounded somewhere in between the SRM-727 and the SRD-7 Pro, taking the best of both worlds and adding a truckload of tight controlled bass and resolving the very little details in the music. It could be argued that its overall presentation is a bit sterile, but I liked it a lot, except for the cost.
Last edited by GPH; 11-21-2008 at 09:00 AM. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"You must learn about these valves, Lawrence! Or tubes as you would call them. Your education is incomplete otherwise. I cannot believe the number of years I wasted on sprockets! God!" |
|
||||
|
GPH-
I am confused because you mention the 007tII at the beginning of your post but then speak only about the 727. Not sure if it is typographical or if you have heard both in comparison to the KGSS DX and/or SRD-7s. How many watts does the Cambridge put out? |
|
||||
|
Quote:
The Cambridge puts out 120W per channel. |
|
||||
|
The 007t has never done much for me with any of the Stax headphones and it cripples the SR-007. Switching to 6S4A output tubes could help but that requires major surgery. Good IC's do help making the combo sound less dark but it's like a band-aid on a bullet wound.
A better amp wakes them up and shows what they really can do so I think you should try to audition the BHSE and a SR-007 Mk1 as well. Transformers are also an option but it doesn't matter how much power to try to use with the Stax boxes, it won't do much good. The transformers are tiny (fit in the palm of you hand) and simply aren't designed for anything close to the load of the SR-007 and thus can't pass the power needed. Even a low wattage output transformer is much larger then the Stax units which are nothing more then reversed output trafos so they can't take a lot of current. A simple solution would be to buy the cheapest Hammond push-pull output trafos and wire them up backwards with a bias supply but this hasn't been tried AFAIK. I've wanted to try this for a long time but shipping dead weight via Fedex over the pond isn't a wise investment...
__________________
Main rig: APL 3910 32bit -> No amp at all... (BHSE when ever it will be ready and a few DIY amps under way)Computer rig: Trends UD-10.1 -> AudioZone DAC -> Stax SRM-717 Headphones: Stax SR-Ω, SR-Ω w/SR-007 drivers, SR-007 and SR-1 |
|
||||
|
Got my Lambda Nova Signature & T1S yesterday. Unfortunately I arrived at the seller's house late in the evening so I didn't have much time to listen to it but it was wonderful. It seemed to have a better bass and a more relaxed sound compared to listening the SRM-1/MK2 & SR-404 combo a few days ago. Now I just need a decent balanced DAC to complete it but I am out of funds for a while.
__________________
No matter how hard you try, there will always be a weak element in your system. |
|
||||
|
There is no added benefit of using a balanced dac with the T1S unless you really have to. The amp is balanced so you only gain about 3dB worth of volume and not much else. The quality of the dac is much more important then the connection it uses.
__________________
Main rig: APL 3910 32bit -> No amp at all... (BHSE when ever it will be ready and a few DIY amps under way)Computer rig: Trends UD-10.1 -> AudioZone DAC -> Stax SRM-717 Headphones: Stax SR-Ω, SR-Ω w/SR-007 drivers, SR-007 and SR-1 |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|