Yet Another Thread To Talk About Digital Cables.
discuss.
Yet Another Thread To Talk About Digital Cables.
discuss.
This space intentionally left blank.
nice bait..I will bite
Couple questions have been bugging me since I started thinking about digital cables.
On the most basic level, the signal inside the cable is modified by the reflection, and can be expressed as V1(z) = V0 (e^(-jbz) + Ghe* e^(jbz)); and the signal as it passed into the DAC can be expressed as V2=tau*V0*e^(-jbz), where tau = 1+ Ghe. Ghe = (Z2 (medium 2; digital interface) - Z1 (digital cable))/(Z2+Z1)
So if you have no reflection whatsoever going back into digital cable from the DAC, Ghe = 0, so V1 is the same as V2.
So if this is calculable, it must be measurable, the question is what does it sound like? If there is a difference which connector (BNC/XLR/RCA) can achieve the lowest Ghe value?
I would say the connection between a shovel and the back of your head.![]()
The road of excess leads to the palace of wisdom; for we never know what is enough until we know what is more than enough. ~ William Blake
That connection would need to be repeated many times to get a valid frame of reference.
But what's the formula for when the signal flows from ass to mouth?
1:08 AM [cetoole] holy cow this lube made a huge difference
5:44 PM [NightWoundsTime] I don't particularly like long ones though. A short one will do alright.
Sources: DIY Buffalo DAC, DIY γ2 DAC, iPod Classic 80Gb
Amps: DIY MMM/σ11, DIY Exstata SS
Phones: ATH-AD900, ATH-ESW9, UE SuperFi 5Pro, Stax SR-Lambda
Feedback: Head-Case Head-Fi
Yeah, I have no idea what that urban-sidewalk-meets-brick-wall between "...^t..." and "...H(α)..." is meant to convey. Is that APL for "something mysterious happens here" or "fuzzy logic", perhaps?
I remain,DC
WT
Show me your -itis.
Dirty Laundry Will Out.
:-Peter, aka :-Dusty :-Chalk
I liked my imagery better.![]()
I remain,DC
WT
Show me your -itis.
Dirty Laundry Will Out.
:-Peter, aka :-Dusty :-Chalk