Leaderboard

I just put in an application for a two-bedroom townhome apartment a 5 minute walk from my office. I'm excited to move, and even more excited to be able to walk to work every day. Fingers crossed everything works out!

One of my favorite albums of the 80's.

Just got off a Zoom call with 3 friends, who I've known 56 years/43 years/35 years. It absolutely filled my heart. Haven't talked (voice) or seen a couple of them for over a year, and as with good friends we just kind of picked up where we left off. Love it!

IMHO the pleasure of commuting to work by walk is well worth any other shortcomings. And there may be a few. Good luck!

Hi! I have _a lot_ of speaker cable on hand - all DH Labs - Q-10 ($25/ft), T-14 ($10/ft) and Odyssey ($4/ft). I am going to be making up a couple sets of cables and would be happy to make some extra sets - I use nice sleeving I use on my cables and can work with you on termination.

Finally, my mini T2 is completed. Just want to share my build experience and listening impression for those who are about to build one. Also, a huge shout-out for JoaMat, who conceptualised and designed the amp, provided me with invaluable tips when I was debugging my mini T2 and encouraged me to share my experiences here. -------------------------------- Pics or it didn't happen: -------------------------------- Build experience: Before this amp, I have built the Carbon and Grounded Grid, as well as quite a few dynamic amps including the SMD Dynalo. Overall, I am comfortable dealing with electrostatic amp voltages, but I have limited experiences working on dense and tiny SMD boards. I built the SMD Dynalo with a soldering iron, but this method was unsuitable for the Mini T2 due to the density of the components and the fact that I tend to use copious amounts of flux grease when I solder by hand - it would be too tough to clean the flux stuck underneath the tiny components. Therefore, I decided to solder the SMD parts by the solder paste and hot-air gun method. I used 1 set of mini T2 board, 3 through-hole GRHV boards and 1 delay board (warmup.zip). This amp is fast to build so long as you have a decent hot air gun (I got mine from Taobao for around 25 USD), a pair of fine tip tweezers and some patience. I used a stencil to apply solder paste on one side of the mini T2 board first, then populated all SMD components and used the hot air gun to melt the solder paste. It was quite satisfying to see the tiny parts drawn into their rightful place by the magic of surface tension. It took me about 1 hour to complete the SMD soldering for 1 side, so I'd say that this method is really efficient for the number of parts to be populated. The through-hole components and the tube sockets were populated next, and I used some terminal blocks for the power rail inputs. Just be sure to apply jumper wire for the -15V near the servo opamp. Otherwise, you risk seeing 400V at voltage offset, and frying some input tubes. The transformers I used were 130W and 87W for the HV and LV respectively. There is also a dedicated floating 12V winding for the delay board, and separate filament supply windings are used for the power tubes and input tubes for each channel. Voltage rails were pretty standard - +-15V, +220V, +400V and -460V. The warm-up time was set to 25 sec. There is no need to adjust for output current bias as in the Carbon or GG. The balance servo is activated by default, and all there is to adjust is the output voltage offset with respect to ground, and it can be easily adjusted so long as the potentiometers are soldered to the same side as the tube sockets. The amp runs cool. I used heatsinks that measure 7cm tall, 30cm deep, 5cm wide for each side of the chassis. At steady state, the amp module runs at 39 deg C, PSU runs at 35 deg C. In comparison, my 450V 20mA biased Carbon runs at 48 deg C with 15cm-tall heatsinks. Here are some errors I encountered here and the directions I took to debug. They are based on spice simulation by JoaMat. Hopefully, my tips can help builders who encounter similar issues as I did. 1. On power-up, offset voltage rises to 400V immediately after the HV kicked in. Check the jumper connection for the opamp -15v power supply. They are very short and can be easily missed. 2. 50K resistor explodes (either R11 or R12). It is likely due to an unconnected input tube or dead tube. Check input tubes and Q1A/B, Q4/5, Q11/12, Q3A/B of the same side. Also check tube sockets, because even the expensive ones can have loose connection on NOS tubes. 3. Q1A/B burns. This might not be easy to spot. The sign can be as subtle as a discoloration/fading of the silkscreen on the component surface, or a subtle exudation of flux around the collector pin of the component. This is likely due to a shorted input tube. ------------------------------ Sound impressions Take this section with a pinch of salt, for every DIY build is one-of-a-kind, and mine is no exception. For my mini T2, I used Duelund tinned copper wire as input cable, EIZZ stepped attenuator, STAX SPC earspeaker wires as output wires and a 5-pin socket ripped from a STAX extension cable. The headphone I used was the ES1a by ES Labs. I wish I had the Stax flagships to do this impression and comparison. The amp is fed by a AK4497 DAC, straight out of DAC and a coupling capacitor, bypassing any low-pass filters. For the following impression, I used decent tubes - Mullard xf2 EL34 as output, Brimar ECC88 as V1 and Sovtek 6922 as V2. Tubes do affect the sound significantly, and I will talk about that later in the discussion. My 450V 20mA bias Carbon with GRHV&LV will be a point of reference, as I am sure that this is a sound that many here are familiar with. It has the same volume pot as the mini T2 but SPC input wires and copper output wires. The mini T2 is full sounding with a natural tone. It has got a certain “WOW” factor that makes my carbon sound unimaginative in comparison. First off, the tonality of the mini T2 is warm and mildly bright such that the sound is airy but non-fatiguing, no matter how loud I cranked the volume up. The bass extends deep with a sufficient rumble where the track calls for it. The airy top end gives the amp a wide soundstage, that is paired with sufficient depth. Instrument and vocal placement are accurate and appropriate, without excessive forwardness or recess. Despite the soundstage being big, it does not sound hollow, because the music is full of details and creates a sense of well-layered space that is almost holographic. I have tested the amp briefly with other tubes and found that input and output tubes affect the sound most significantly. If input tubes have slightly mismatched sections, the balance would be too great to be zero-ed with potentiometer and balance servo. The small tubes I used are unassuming. Had I upgraded to better tubes, I guess the amp would sound better. Compared to the Carbon, the mini T2 sounds more organic, more layered and the mids are considerably warmer. It is also way more forgiving on bad recordings. The timbre sounds truer to life, soundstage is slightly larger, and feels like the music has more room to breathe. However, bass extension is not as deep as on the Carbon, and Carbon generally feels more analytical and snappier. To conclude, if there’s one word to describe this amp, it would be “fun”. It’s fun to build and definitely fun to listen to and roll tubes. I consider it as a step up from the Carbon when I use some decent tubes. Otherwise, this amp with standard new-production tubes would be at least on par as the Carbon.

My guide to golden reference high voltage (grhv) variants Here is my attempt at documenting some of the different GRHV board variations. (this will be work in progress for sometime) feel free to private message me with any additions comments, corrections etc. please note the schematic for version 1.5 has been reverse engineered by me from the gerbers and may contain error(s). location of the gerbers: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B_iJFfZStuVhSE5nOHBVdTByR1k golden reference filename naming guide fat - boards which are wider and have less height than the non fat variants L bracket mounting only same as the non fat variants. fat with S as the last character of the filename - boards which are wider and have less height than the non fat variants and the height is about 6.3mm less than the fat variant. these boards also feature more screw hole options for the mounting the pcb to the case including an option of not using an L shaped bracket and mounting the transistors directly to the vertical face of a heatsink/side of the case. a silkscreen cut line is included to guide removal of the L bracket mounting roles to facilitate direct transistor to heatsink mounting. dual - has both positive and negative hv supply with additional bias and both positive and negative low voltage supplies on a single pcb left - has a single negative hv rail and both positive and negative low voltage supplies right - has a single positive hv rail and bias no new in the filename version - 1.5 boards high voltage starts instantly board has high voltage VAC power. Topology is much simpler then version 1.7 and 1.8 and therefore not considered golden reference. new in the filename actual golden reference boards with extensive post pass transistor regulation. new without sw in the filename- version 1.7 high voltage starts instantly board has high voltage VAC power. new with sw in the filename - version 1.8 or later boards same topology as 1.7 but high voltage will not start until dc power supplied to the cpc1117n no dual and no fat in the filename - minimal width and quite high. NOTE placement of the screw terminals for input VAC can vary considerably depending on if the board is a fat, fat S or non fat. Overview of the versions It is the extensive post pass transistor regulation that marks the golden reference out from the other power supply designs as such version 1.5 and earlier not classify as a golden reference since they lack any post pass transistor regulation. No details of versions before 1.5 or version 1.6 could be found in the gerber archives. Apparently pre 1.5 versions had on board heatsinks and ground lanes but there gerbers and not available in the google drive archive. No schematic could be found for version 1.5 although after reverse engineering it was found that the circlotronps.pdf is similar in topology but modified to support 900V output. No bill of materials could be found for version 1.5 and it is not certain what is the power rating for the larger resistors. All versions have the pcb tracks on the underside with no tracks on the top. All versions have no ground plane ALL versions have bleed resistors to help discharge the high voltage caps although version 1.5 and a few variants of 1.7 use a single high power resistor and the rest two 1/2W resistors in series. All versions have the same basic voltage regulator based low voltage positive and negative supplies All versions have the same bias supply although v1.5 has different resistor values. ALL versions use a LT1021-10 voltage reference All the versions 1.5, 1.7 and 1.8 use a C2M1000170D pass transistor All the versions use a 10M90S pre regulator although version 1.5 controls it with a zener string and 1.7 and 1.8 control with a DN2540. 1.7 and 1.8 are almost identical in topology although 1.8 does not automatically start the high voltages. DC must be applied to the CPC1117N to start. note 1.8 does not have provision for screw terminals for the DC to switch on the cpc1117n. versions 1.7 and 1.8 have more post regulation using a second 10m90s (which is not present in version 1.5) after the 1N4007 protection diode. version 1.5 uses a 10ohm current sense resistor and versions 1.7 and 1.8 use 5.1ohm by default. version 1.5 uses a 10K resistor to ground in the 3 series resistor chain to decide the output voltage, 1.7 and 1.8 use 20K to get 400V output. The other 2 resistors in the chain are the same for version 1.5 and version 1.7/1.8 version 1.5 uses two stn0214 which are replaced by two KSC5026M in v1.7/1.8 version 1.5 uses two stn9360 which are replaced by two BC557B in v1.7/1.8 Known non golden reference boards which are variations or predecessors to version 1.5 and golden reference variants NOTE These have not been looked at in detail by me or fully reverse engineered. The cyclotron power supply series follows a similar evolution to the golden reference. earlier cyclotron psus (circlotronps.PDF) use a variation of version 1.5 topology with modifications to bring the output up to 900V. However since it lacks any post pass transistor regulation it can not be considered a golden reference these psus do not have new in their name. The later cyclotron power supplies have the words new or newver in their name on quick inspection of the gerbers appear to be modifications for 900V of the version 1.7 power supplies, have post pass transistor regulation and may be considered golden reference variants. The filename conventions follows the guide above with dual, single, S and SWS versions available. circlotronhvpowerdualnew.zip appears to be derived from the version 1.7 topology with a similar complement of transistors. On the underside of the pcb there are two additional stn0214 transistors compared to the version 1.7 plus 3 mount points for a total of 500V worth of smd zeners. circlotronhvpowerdualnewer2.zip ditches the zener string and introduces another stn3960 and includes sw and sws variations. The kgsshv8g.pdf power supply appears to be an predecessor version of version 1.5. There are very close similarities in topology including no post pass transistor regulation. Current sense is still controlled by a 2n3904. The pre-regulator is 10m90s controlled by a zener string and a quad of transistors like the version 1.5. However the pass transistor is two parallel fqpf8n80c. The control transistors are 2sa1486 instead of stn9360 and 2sc3840 instead of stn0214. Both types of control transistor are no longer in production and hence the conclusion this is older than version 1.5. Apparently these boards are classified as KGSSHV ------------------------------------------------ Version 1.5 boards ------------------------------------------------- predecessor to the golden reference with no post pass transistor regulation the board uses a single high wattage bleed resistor for each cap uses multiple stn9360s, stn0214s uses a serial zener string for to control the 10m90s pre regulator. LT1021-10 voltage reference based single sided board kgsshvpssicfetdual2.zip this has both positive and negative rails, a simple voltage regulator based low voltage positive and negative supply and 580V for stax headphones bias board size approx. width 152.7mm height 165mm silkscreen revision 1.5 kgsshvpssicfetsingle2.zip this has a single rail identical to the kgsshvpssicfetdual2 in topology and 580V for stax headphones bias board size approx. width 76.5mm height 165mm silkscreen revision 1.5 ------------------------------------------------ Version 1.7 boards ------------------------------------------------- considered the first known golden reference board version (given the lack of information on version 1.6) has extensive post pass transistor regulation. the board uses two serial bleed resistors for each cap uses a single stn9360s and multiple BC557B and KSC5026M uses dn2540 and 10m90s for stage early voltage control for the input to the c2m1000170D LT1021-10 voltage reference based double sided board kgsshvpssicfetdual2new.zip this has both positive and negative rails, a simple voltage regulator based low voltage positive and negative supply and 580V for stax headphones bias board size approx. width 152.7mm height 165mm silkscreen revision 1.7 kgsshvpssicfetsingle2new.zip this has a single positive rail identical to the kgsshvpssicfetdual2new in topology and 580V for stax headphones bias board size approx. width 76.5mm height 165mm silkscreen revision 1.7 single bleed resistor for each cap kgsshvpssicfetsinglenewleft.zip this has a single negative rail identical to the kgsshvpssicfetdual2new in topology and has a simple low voltage positive and negative regulators based supply board size approx. width 76.4mm height 165.3mm silkscreen revision 1.7 kgsshvpssicfetsinglenewright.zip this has a single positive rail identical to the kgsshvpssicfetdual2new in topology and bias supply board size approx. width 76.4mm height 165.3mm silkscreen revision 1.7 kgsshvpssicfetsinglenewleftfat.zip this has a single negative rail identical to the kgsshvpssicfetdual2new in topology and has a simple low voltage positive and negative regulators based supply board size approx. width 138.7mm height 103.1mm silkscreen revision 1.71 kgsshvpssicfetsinglenewrightfat.zip this has a single positive rail identical to the kgsshvpssicfetdual2new in topology and has a 580v stax bias supply board size approx. width 138.6mm height 103.1mm silkscreen revision 1.71 kgsshvpssicfetsinglenewleftfatS.zip this has a single negative rail identical to the kgsshvpssicfetdual2new in topology and has a simple low voltage positive and negative regulators based supply has more mounting options for the pass transistor, 4 holes for mounting to a case and can be used with or without an L shaped bracket board size approx. width 138.7mm height 98.6mm (slightly less height than the fat non S version silkscreen revision 1.71s kgsshvpssicfetsinglenewrightfatS.zip this has a single positive rail identical to the kgsshvpssicfetdual2new in topology and has a bias supply has more mounting options for the pass transistor, 4 holes for mounting to a case and can be used with or without an L shaped bracket board size approx. width 138.7mm height 98.6mm (slightly less height than the fat non S version silkscreen revision 1.71s ------------------------------------------------ Version 1.8 boards ------------------------------------------------- same topology as version 1.7 making this a golden reference board adds a cpc1117n and 600ohm resistor to control high voltage startup the high voltage will not start-up automatically. This negates the need for a external relay for delayed start-up and just requires dc power to be supplied to the cpc1117n (not present in earlier versions) for the high voltage to start-up. if you want the board to power up instantly simply omit the 600ohm resistor and cpc1117n and it will act just like the version 1.7 instant start boards. boards same size as the equivalent version 1.7 pcbs silkscreen 1.8 there does not seem to be a dual version of this board kgsshvpssicfetsinglenewleftSWS.zip this has a single negative rail almost identical to the kgsshvpssicfetdual2new in topology and has a simple low voltage positive and negative regulators based supply board size approx. width 76.4mm height 165.3mm silkscreen revision 1.8 kgsshvpssicfetsinglenewrightSWS.zip this has a single positive rail almost identical to the kgsshvpssicfetdual2new in topology and has a bias supply board size approx. width 76.4mm height 165.3mm silkscreen revision 1.8 kgsshvpssicfetsinglenewleftfatSW.zip this has a single negative rail almost identical to the kgsshvpssicfetdual2new in topology and has a simple low voltage positive and negative regulators based supply board size approx. width 138.7mm height 103.7mm silkscreen revision 1.8 kgsshvpssicfetsinglenewrightfatSW.zip this has a single positive rail almost identical to the kgsshvpssicfetdual2new in topology and bias based supply board size approx. width 138.7mm height 103.7mm silkscreen revision 1.8 kgsshvpssicfetsinglenewleftfatSWS.zip this has a single negative rail almost identical to the kgsshvpssicfetdual2new in topology and has a simple low voltage positive and negative regulators based supply has more mounting options for the pass transistor, 4 holes for mounting to a case and can be used with or without an L shaped bracket board size approx. width 138.7mm height 98.6mm (slightly less height than the fat non S version silkscreen revision 1.8 kgsshvpssicfetsinglenewrightfatSWS.zip this has a single positive rail almost identical to the kgsshvpssicfetdual2new in topology and has a bias supply has more mounting options for the pass transistor, 4 holes for mounting to a case and can be used with or without an L shaped bracket board size approx. width 138.7mm height 98.6mm (slightly less height than the fat non S version silkscreen revision 1.8

Spotify HiFi is a lossless streaming tier coming later this year https://www.theverge.com/2021/2/22/22295273/spotify-hifi-announced-lossless-streaming-hd-quality https://newsroom.spotify.com/2021-02-22/five-things-to-know-about-spotify-hifi/ from: https://newsroom.spotify.com/stream-on/

Finally. Might be the beginning of the end for Tidal. Hopefully (cr)Apple Music feels they need to offer a lossless tier too to compete.

I had a couple of SSD's fail in the early days of the species (always under warranty though). In the past few years I've stuck with Samsung and Crucial and (fingers crossed) haven't had an issue. I do manual backups and virus checks at the beginning of every month. My rig has around 7.5 TB of data and most of the time I can do all that in a little more than a hour. I follow a lot of audio archivists activities and read some of the research they put into their efforts to digitize their collections and maintain those archives. Some of these collections are stored on HDD (spinning) and are meant to preserve and make these assets available for research and the public. One of the big recommendations is to "spin up" all of the drives annually. They had discovered drive failures/data losses on drives that weren't accessed since they were first created during their mass digitization projects. Of course, most of us shouldn't have an issue with that since we should be backing up or using our drives more than once a year. Imagine spinning up The Library of Congress! Thankfully, another "best practice" for these archives is to store assets in 3 different places and preserve the original analog sources (although the most "at risk" media like lacquer disks that were quickly deteriorating were prioritized for the digitization) so very few priceless recordings were lost forever.

Has anyone ever seen them in the same room? 🤔

raid 0 scares me, but that's because 90% of my job is replacing failing hard drives.

Xavi Bou’s Portraits of Birds in Flight https://www.audubon.org/news/how-xavi-bou-makes-his-mesmerizing-portraits-birds-flight

Fermented meat.

Appreciate the well wishes, everyone. I actually had a pour of that birth year BenRiach decant you gave me. It was quite tasty, thanks again.

More mid-fat snow testing in preparation for a longer ride tomorrow morning.

It had been a long time since I played with another of my favorite flight simulators. IL 2 Sturmovik It's a shame it doesn't have a clickable cockpit like DCS World. I spend hours flying the "Flying Circus" on the Fokker DR I with t he von Richthofen's red skin.

Eventually I managed to dig up some money. I also had a brand new pair of Stax pads at hand. Thanks for the advice. I’m really happy with this Headphone.

Greg gifted us a beautiful, original, one of a kind knife for BBQ and other meat related duties. These pics don't do it justice but I'll try again in the daylight. Thank you for your thoughtless and kudos on your artistry! The Meat Machete Rulez!

Harvested an old Cardas Headphone cable to make a balanced cable for the HD800. Neutrik 4-pin XLR connectors. The HD800 connectors are from Parts Connecxion and a royal PITA to work with.

RIP Daft Punk - they are splitting up: https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/22/entertainment/daft-punk-split-intl-scli/index.html