Jump to content

Jon L

High Rollers
  • Posts

    1,035
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Jon L

  1. 2 hours ago, padam said:

    My biggest issue is the color and the general look, sometimes good, sometimes quite a struggle.

    I have bought a Canon 5D Mk1 for fun (YT hype), and I can recommend it to anybody starting out for fun over a crop sensor, if video is not needed. It certainly does feel kind of big and ancient, so I don't use it as much, but the images are really lovely, the colors are a whole lot better than any Sony, this is something you can't measure on DXO.

    Colors are a problem with Sony.  I would never use out of camera colors from my Sony A7R, but I have gotten used to carrying my Colorchecker passport, at least a grey card.  

    Colors out of my Canon 5D III are much nicer out of camera; however, they are still not neutral enough for any serious work IMO, so I end up using Colorchecker anyway.

  2. I think Nikon hit one out of the park with the Z7.  I can almost feel the Canon exec's sweating bullets, as Canon is supposed to unveil their own mirrorless full frame camera soon, which I doubt is going to be as capable as Nikon's version.  

    As for me, I am going to use my original Sony A7R into the ground as its svelt size and portability is unbeatable, as newer mirrorless full-frame cameras continue to get larger.  

    Sony A7R vs. A7R III size

    SonyA7rVsA7r3.jpg

     

    Sony A7R III vs. Nikon Z7 size

    SonyA7r3vsNikonZ7.jpg

    • Like 1
  3. On 1/22/2018 at 12:01 AM, vvar10ck said:

    Good day everyone! Unfortunately Head-fi topic of Perun was deleted and they're requested for a sponsorship, it's from 1K $ per month and too expencive for us. Feel free to contact me via PM or http://perun.prfi.ru mentioned above.

     

     

    _Image00001.jpg

    Is that amp your company's amp?  It doesn't seem to be on your website and says "Flux Lab" on it?

  4. 19 hours ago, ironbut said:

    If you're looking for a pair of monitors to only do critical listening of other components in the system, I suggest giving a pair of Amphion One 18 with one of their matching amps a listen.

    I did some mixing on a pair of these and while I'd never want to own a pair just for listening, they are audio microscopes.

    They've been the FOTM for mix engineers for a year or two and the internet is packing with raves.

    You can pick up a pair for around $3k USD and the matching amp is $1500 IIRC.

    When you get into this realm, don't buy without hearing them!

    Like I said, they were amazing to do a mix on but personally, I hate them.

    http://www.amphion.fi/en/create/products/one18/

    Veerry interesting.  Amphion is one of my favorite home speaker brands, and I wonder how much their studio line sounds different from their home line, i.e. Argon 3.  

  5. 40 minutes ago, Pars said:

    3) high price (so you know it's gotta be good) - actually not too bad at $1400

    I was thinking it might be nice alternative tranformer box for electrostats and dynamics (presuming design is safe unlike WEE),.... until I saw the price :o

  6. Jonathan Valin:

    "Oh, and I’ve saved the best for last. Not only are the 30.7s the handsomest-looking large Maggies of all time (in their blue trim and snow-white panel covers), they are also among the best deals Maggie has ever offered. They cost $29,000 the pair (release slated for January). That’s not chump change, I grant you, but compared to the price of the six-figure speakers they so successfully compete against, it makes them, perhaps, the greatest bargain in ultra-high-end history. "

    http://www.theabsolutesound.com/articles/magnepan-307-loudspeaker-part-one/

    • Like 1
  7. On 10/4/2017 at 1:20 PM, gepardcv said:

    2...It should support Bluetooth out, since I expect sound quality there to improve over time. Integrated amps with Bluetooth inputs are already on the market.

    3...The DAC connection pretty much has to be USB, unless you use something like an Eitr (in which case you're still on USB from device to the DDC). For the hardcore anti-USB crowd, that pretty much makes this set-up a non-starter :rolleyes:.

    Having recently looked into setting up home wireless audio, I highly doubt Bluetooth will improve "enough" over time, i.e. ever become lossless.  Highly touted aptX bluetooth is not even lossless, and even the latest and greatest high-tech bluetooth implementation "aptX HD" is not lossless, in addition to requiring both sender and receiver to have aptX HD capability, which only a few devices currently support.  

    For me, any kind of high-fidelity wireless audio system cannot be based on bluetooth, notwithstanding how much I enjoy my UE Boom bluetooth speaker in my shower.  

    I feel the same way about DAC's with USB input as I do about spdif inputs.  These are simply fatally flawed ways to transmit digital audio and should never have been allowed to become de facto standards.  on surface, USB seems to have better chance with various "improved" asynchronous methods becoming available quarterly; however, IME, it takes Herculean efforts on hardware and software side, not to mention various USB-enhancing filters, power supplies, and various doohickies for USB to sound "pretty good."  Even then, I feel I can play a redbook CD (or better yet a good high-res disc) in a good one-box CD player and achieve significantly better sound quality than the said CD player's USB input..

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.