Jump to content

Les_Garten

High Rollers
  • Posts

    687
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Les_Garten

  1. Can you send the PCB back as defective? Conformal coatings are usually solder thru for repairs, so yes, their thermal protection is low by design. I would think it would be enough unless you get stubborn with misapplication of your soldering iron :eek:

    I don't think it needs to be sent back if I can seal it. On the KGSS boards, what is the arc potential at the outputs? It would have to jump 1.40 mm from the R- output Pad. I thought it was about 3mm but it's closer than that. I mic'd it at 1.40mm.

  2. You can use the "Singlepower method", which is to solder a paper clip across the void.

    My problem is the opposite. The missing mask exposes the ground plane. I'm trying to seal it up. It's within about 3mm of an output pad on an amp board. Seems my options are to ignore and be careful around it, or try to seal it with something resistant to high temp.

    Hmmm, what is the voltage carrying capability and resistance of a paper clip. Can't honestly say that solution hasn't crossed my mind n the past.

    I have a call into Loktite to see if they have a high temp epoxy that is reasonably priced.

  3. I just got a PCB that has a void in the solder mask on top of the board. It is not a scratch, the mask is kinda piled up around the void. It looks like a contaminant may have kept the mask off that area. There are some epoxies online to fix this. I was wondering if you guys know of something locally obtainable to fix this?

  4. If I had the heatsinks and could therefore link the singles into a double unit, then I'd use them but I do have a small stash of 389's so I continue to use them instead. The LSK389 is supposed to be better so I might just use that instead when I run out.

    How important is it for the 389's to be matched side to side? Is it possible to solder in the LSK389 to fit that footprint?

  5. Happy to help. :) Once people start working on their KGSS amps it might be time to start a thread on them with the correct part numbers, tips etc.

    I got my Boards this week, very pretty! I sent Dan an email about the 2SK389 subs. If you had the choice of unmatched 2SK389s or matched 2SK170s, you would do the 170s, correct?

  6. It'd be easier to just fuse the shafts together, wouldn't it?

    Hmm, that would be one way to do it. The shafts are 5mm and 8mm. So your average 6mm Vol knob won't work. I suppose you could fuse together and DRILL Baby DRILL! But I would like to find the proper knob.

    There's this, but I didn't check to see if it would work:

    KN5700B1/4 Tyco Electronics / Alcoswitch Knobs & Dials

    I'm not sure what that knob does but it is 6mm shaft size so it's not meant for these POTs.

    I'm thinking that since the POTs exist, the knobs have to also. This looks like the POT that would be on the STAX amps where you have the two channels on that Balance knob.

  7. I used a Beta22+srd-7 pro to drive my O2 Mk1 for about month. It actually sounded a lot better than I thought it would: only slightly dark and less refined. I preferred the O2 Mk1 in this setup to the HD800 so I ended up getting a KGSS and selling my HD800 and Beta22. The KGSS, of course, is a huge improvement.

    Good to know I'm going in the right direction! Did you sell your 303s?

  8. I don't know about the 179 specifically, but I have a 189 and absolutely love it. Would've probably gotten the 187, since I don't use the logging, but I found a good deal on a used 189 before I could find one on a 187.

    One thing I will suggest is getting a decent set of test leads, you wouldn't believe how much they can come in handy. I have ones that'll clip onto component leads so you can easily adjust trimpots and such, tips with a plastic guard that'll safely measure one pin on a DIP IC (like an opamp) without sliding off and shorting against the adjacent ones, ones with long sheathed extensions to measure in tight spots, etc. I really don't know how I got by with just regular test leads before.

    I'd probably rather use a more basic meter with good leads than a fancy meter with only standard leads, but maybe I'm just weird.

    Hi,

    Do you have a link to the Leads you are referring to here? I'm looking and have some leads similar to what you describe, but my leads are pretty cheap and I have no idea what Voltage they are rated for.

  9. if it's any consolation, shunted pots sound great :D

    Blown drivers, popped eardrums and severe heart palpitations are nothing compared to that.

    Yeah no kidding! But now I wonder about letting that stuff break in unattended for weeks straight like I'm inclined to do. The chance of a failure like that is small, but when that chance nails ya, wheee!

  10. I have a Vol Pot from Audio-GD(Kingwa). They use a different way of wiring their Vol Controllers than I've seen and I wanted to hear what you guys think about the method both advantages and disadvantages. Instead of entering the POT on the input and exiting the Signal on the output after passing thru the POT, he uses the POT as a drain of least resistance it looks to me.

    The INPUT from the SOURCE and the OUTPUT to the Amp are on the same solder point. The POT works backwards. As you turn the knob clockwise, the Impedance increases. The Impedance is around 1 ohm when the knob is all the way counter-clockwise.

    The way I intepret his design is that the signal hits the solder pad on the POT and makes it's path choice based on least resistance. If the POT is Full CCW, the pad is shorted to ground for practical purposes and the Signal goes to ground. If the knob is turned CW, the impedance goes up and some of the signal starts to flow against the input impedance of the amp and the Vol is increased.

    At least this is how I think this works, correct me where needed. He does this with his relay based stepped attenuators as well.

    Below is a drawing of the path as well as two PIX of a POT he sent me with the wiring of the board the POT is mounted to. I posted Links to the PIX because they are large.

    What do you guys think of this approach?

    He says he does this because the POT is not in the signal path so he gets better SQ. The only drawback being on some gear maybe not getting full attenuation of volume when the knob is full CCW.

    This idea looks like it has a lot of merit, has it been done by any of you guys or anyone else that you know?

    If you recognize the POT, that would be helpful also.

    Vol.JPG

    http://www.turbonet.biz/misc/pot/AAA_1934.JPG

    http://www.turbonet.biz/misc/pot/AAA_1935.JPG

    Thanx!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.