Jump to content

boomana

Moderators
  • Posts

    8,606
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    26

Posts posted by boomana

  1. First of all, that's why I asked for examples. Because I used to have an animated face (CG, but kind of anime-y) as my avatar over there. Let's see if I can find it again...yeah, here it is:

    YUI_SHOP_1_RS_001.jpg

    Now, admittedly, it's from hentai, but I liked it because of the art involved. Too much of CG (and anime) was cold and lifeless, and this particular pic had a certain spark/sparkle in her eye that seemed to bring her to life. It was more out of art appreciation that I used it than anything else.

    Secondly -- no-one said anything about jacking off. I said, "look at". If I jacked off every time I saw a pretty or hot or sexy or underdressed woman or a little more breast than usual, I'd have to be jacking off several times a day. I'm too old for that shit.

    That said, I do like hot and sexy women, be they real, animated, or artfully drawn (Sorayama calls his art "hyper illustration" [although I have to admit I can't get into anything but his pre-Penthouse days]). And I have gotten laid. Married even. Heck, I've even had strippers proposition me, and they know that I'm a pervert.

    Finally -- if they really bother you, you can turn avatars off. I think of it as a challenge -- I'm on another board where people change avatars and even monikers more frequently than I do. Sometimes it's impossible to recognize someone, except by clicking on their previous posts link.

    I don't find that one creepy at all, and at the end of the day, none of them really bother me. Why let an avatar bother me?....though somebody, jwildermood or something like that, once had one of a shirtless guy, assumedly him, with two obviously shirtless middle-aged and not attractive women cozied up next to him. I half thought it was funny that he was a big enough ass to put that out there, and half repulsed. That may have been the only avatar that bugged me, but made me laugh at the same time. A kazillion years ago I worked at place where lots of people like that used to hang out (literally speaking) quite freely. Not pleasant.

  2. It's for the same reason that a lot of anime is creepy. It's of "eating disorder" skinny women luridly posed. The idea of somebody jacking off to a drawing is weird.

    Uh... I pretty much agree with this though I try real hard not to take it that far in my mind. I professionally have to deal with sex deviants and addicts, and though nothing surprises me anymore (anime is mild, even the anime porn), that still doesn't mean I like having that image in my brain.

  3. Hyper-sexualized cartoons and gut reaction, nothing more or less. It's an eeewwww immediate response, and is the same for any male hyper-sexualized cartoons as well, and perhaps moreso. I don't have the same reaction to sexualized pics of real men or women, as long as they're...well, attractive. It's the cartoon thing. On a walking about my day level, I could care less what anybody likes to use for their avatar or watch as cartoons, sexualized or not, but it's creepy to me when I see it, and I think many women might agree, but I've not exactly asked. Now I'm curious if I'm the only one, so I'll ask some girlfriends and get back to you on that one. I'd far prefer to see pictures of real women or men than cartoon ideals.

  4. After discovering that there was such a thing as headphone forums, the next most surprising thing was the half-naked women avatars, beat out only by the creepier anime avatars. I may have geek-centric tastes, but as a woman, that totally threw me. I was thinking, why are they putting this out there? To say they like breasts? Doesn't everybody? To show that if they like nice butts in bikinis they may get some? Sorta a sympathetic magic type thing? I actually came to the conclusion that those who chose those avatars simply had no imagination and found it was easier to post pictures of half-naked sexy women than to come up with a more unique avatar. The other guys would like seeing it, and they might look cool for having it. I dunno, but sad to say, I actually thought about it. The anime thing still creeps me out, headphones on 'em or not.

    When I was in highschool and college, my friends and I would make fun of guys who had posters of women in their rooms. They were definitely never going to see the real thing as long as those were anywhere near them. Strangely, most women I know have no or little objection to mags or porn, just the posters looming around large. It's like an announcement that you don't want a real woman ever, or at least not for a very long time.

  5. So, I admit I'm far from technologically savvy, but I can often read fairly well. I went to post a reply in the Neked Women Avatar thread and I see no reply button, no quote button...nothing. Do y'all not want my profound and erudite female perspective? Okay, even if not, why no buttons?

  6. I have an Exemplar modded 2900 and it's a great redbook source, one of the best I've heard in the under $5000 range. I've heard better SACD, but it comes close. I also know jp11801's Denon, this specific one for sale, and can attest that's in excellent condition. I think it's a steal for what he's asking. The mods alone run about $3500.

  7. Thanks for the impressions. Anybody know where to buy some velour pads?

    They are AKG part # 2955Z2601 and can be bought for around $13 each (don't remember exactly).

    Frank Rodriguez

    Sales/Parts Administrator

    Harman Pro North America

    8500 Balboa Blvd

    Northridge, CA 91329

    Ph: 818-920-3279

    Fax: 818-920.3208

    I left a couple phone messages and got not response. I finally faxed a request, and he called me right back. I had the pads about two weeks later. I don't know if anyone has an email address. I never did.

  8. I've had the Etys (ER4P/S) for a couple years now, before I even knew headphones could be a hobby, and I had the whole new line of Shures in my home for three weeks a couple months back. I thought the SE210s and SE310s had serious tone problems (does a flute really sound like a guitar ???) and should be trashed. The SE420s and 530s were worth listening to, and I found myself checking out the SE530s almost daily, toying with the idea of wanting to buy something new. I put my Etys aside through most of this period and used both a Larocco PRII and and a Hornet with an imod (lossless). At first, I found myself seduced by a sense of fullness the SE530s give that the ER-4P/S do not. There is a treble roll-off, as others have mentioned, but that doesn't bother me as I'm stupidly sensitive to highs, and had even been talking with a local DIYer about making a filter I can use with full-sized headphones. I enjoyed them, enjoyed just listening to music, sang loudly and horribly along with everything, and could keep them in for a couple hours without even noticing them in my ears.

    Fast foward a couple weeks, and back to the Etys. It took me about five minutes to re-adjust. My first thought was that they felt empty, not thin per say, but missing something...and then the music took over...ah...this is how it's supposed to sound! I started shuffling back and forth between songs and genres, and everything sounded fresh, clear, and right. I went back to the 530s and everything sound okay and I liked it, but the that little rush you get when something just hits you as sooooo good wasn't there.

    The 530s offer a couple nice things (fuller sound, a bit better bottom end, soundstage/headstage/brainstage/whatever, and zero problems for me with the highs) that the Etys do not, but the Etys win for clarity, detail, and timbre, which, at the end of the day, is more important to me. I agree with some who say the Ety's are bright, but only in comparison to much warmer headphones/earphones. They don't strike me as overly bright at all, and just to bright side of neutral. The Shures are much more colored, imo, dark and full, but I enjoyed for that while I had them. I totally get why people like the 500s/530s--they're good and fun, but they won't be replacing my ER 4P/Ss.

    Oh...I did learn that I like the Shure foamies with my Etys (previously only the flanges offered a decent seal without pain), as they help tame the slight problem I had with the Ety's treble extension and are more comfy that the flanges. Win-win for me.

  9. I've been really curious about them. I had the 2500s for a couple months around the beginning of the year, but sold them due to problems I continued to have with the high-mids and treble. I also felt that they didn't represent instruments that I know well, such as flute, saxophone, and violin, accurately. I don't care how much burn-in the drivers take, those instruments just don't sound that way in life, like a metallic sheen was on them and a feeling as if the notes were about to go sharp when, of course, they weren't. Just tonight on head-fi, I was told again it must be my system and my sucky CDs, but I'm not that deaf since I tried them out with a few combos of sources, amps, CDs, etc. <Hey, do you guys over here still blame the CDs for a headphone's consistent sound signature?> Granted, I am overly sensitive to highs, but that still doesn't account for everything. I did like them well enough to hope the Edition 9s had that corrected. I'm still looking for a good pair of closed headphones I'd be willing to take out of the house (work, etc) if I choose. I was hoping these might be it. From the posts here, it looks like the problems I was having with the Prolines may be the same. I'm still hoping to hear some soon.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.