Jump to content

Knuckledragger

High Rollers
  • Posts

    15,952
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    46

Posts posted by Knuckledragger

  1. XyHUkYy.jpg

    OfHRDki.jpg

    CaYoZtJ.jpg

    mhfYnLx.jpg

    e60xwnI.jpg

    6EuMa9j.jpg

    Via Reddit:

    Quote

    Tannoy GRF - Gold 15s
    McIntosh MX110-Z
    Marantz 8B
    McIntosh MI-75 Monoblocks
    Not pictured: Marantz Model 18 and Thorens TD-121


    It took a long time but after having listened to and tried 8 different Tannoy drivers and speakers combination, I settled on the Tannoy Gold 15 GRF's from the 60's - These backloaded horn speakers render bass quite differently compared to the ported bass reflex speakers. That bass quality with the 15" Gold drivers deliver the best overall sound (to my ears). After having tried several different 60's and 70's silverface receivers, I settled on McIntosh MX110-Z for the tube setup and Marantz Model 18 receiver for solid state. I'm still trying to decide between the McIntosh MI-75s and the Marantz 8B. They both have their strengths.

     

    • Like 2
  2. In the parlance of our times, wake up babe, the new 300mm Orestegor dropped.  Not actually, that'd break my toe.  With that said, I had a bunch of packages waiting for me at the post office today.  The Janpol Color 55mm F/5.6 enlargement lens arrived.  It's weird and have no idea what I'm doing with it yet.  I also got a second copy of the Meyer Optik Orestegor 300mm F/4.  If I had any doubts about the extent to which my old copy is afflicted with haze and fungus, they are now laid to rest.  Allow me to illustrate:

    IvhUqNF.jpg

    Old 300mm, around F/8.  Edited in Photoshop to bring the contrast and colors up to acceptable levels.

     

    Om3phim.jpg

    The same, unedited.

     

    nMhQL4G.jpg

    The new 300, today, unedited.  Shee-it.

    • Like 1
  3. I'm almost 50 years old (most of head-case: "Cool story, Knuckles.  We almost remember being 50 years old.")  I'd like to think I'm still "hip" and "with it" but the zoomers inform me on a daily basis I am lacking in "rizz" and that's "no kizzy on god fr fr no cap."  With that said, I use most of the same technologies the youts do.  Discord is possibly the single most important app I use.  Where I draw the line is Tik Tok.  I have never used it nor will I.  The other side of that coin is the fac that I can't stop staring into the abyss that is AI generated images.

     

    YIjKGoJ.jpg

    eq5bFSc.jpg

    udgNCsa.jpg

    6KLslWh.jpg

    NxRTHEN.jpg

    ox2oKYY.jpg

    MM2pOLj.jpg

    8dKQjNp.jpg

    wsF5FEK.jpg

    A generated "white Snoop Dogg" looks like Kid Rock.

     

    fFNTdsC.jpg

    3bpIHdC.jpg

    yV88vBB.jpg

    QxdHAva.jpg

    rGV5jz1.jpg

    s6ss3AL.jpg

    JFcXBqP.jpg

     

  4. I elected to exclude some feet photos which are a non-euclidean nightmare they'd make Yog-Sothoth wince.  I've still got a whole folder full of cursed AI images yet to go.  The real horror here is the AI itself.  Right now it's at the "haha that's so funny it's trying to make something real" phase.  In a shorter time than we can imagine, it will be nearly impossible to identify AI images.  I'm sure we will have people who becomes experts in the field, but that will not stop the era of disinformation from accelerating further.

    DrZ406Q.jpg

    "Don't wake me, I plan on sleeping in."

     

     

    • Like 2
  5. gN596N4.jpg

    YB0U9c4.jpg

    t9lBSf8.jpg

    Y3gBczK.jpg

    Setup by Devon Turnbull at the Lisson Gallery in New York.  I don't mind it except for the turntable, which gives me PTSD flashbacks to elementary school.  I saw Mr. Turnbull described as a "hi-fi influencer" which is a term I refuse to accept.

  6. I have (another) long winded post about cheap cameras with plastic lenses in the works, but I've been distracted by artificial intelligence.  Someone has let loose an AI bot on Flickr.  The account has six photos uploaded to Flickr.  They are all very competently done.  The images have full EXIF, so it's clear they were all taken with a 5D III, in the last few years.  Here's where it gets weird.  This bot account scans images uploaded by other users then spams an AI generated comment on them.  It's weird and inhuman.  Some examples:

    PaPJcH9.jpg

    The Edgartown lighthouse, April 2007.  Dollar Store Camera and Kodak Gold 200.  The bot says:

    Quote

    The majestic lighthouse stands tall, illuminating the dusk with its beacon of sunlight, perfectly complemented by the serene sky and calming body of water. If you appreciated my comment, please take a look at my page.

    You fuckin' WOT, m8?  The EDG lighthouse is famously short and about as majestic as a seagull.  (NB: This is unfair to seagulls, which can appear quite majestic while flying.)  "Calming body of water."  lol.

     

    9K0BIJh.jpg

    Sweetened Water Pond (across the street from where I now live) in November 2006.  Dollar Store Camera, Kodak Gold 200.  Authentic light leaks and muddy colors.  The bot says:

    Quote

    I am mesmerized by the stunning natural landscape captured in this photograph; the vibrant hues of the sky at dusk perfectly complement the tranquil highland lake surrounded by lush trees, reflecting its beauty in the calm watercourse. If you appreciated my comment, please take a look at my page.

    Definitely some "vibrant hues" and "lush trees" going on here.  SMH my head, as the kids say.  This bot account commented on a bunch of photos in a similar fashion.  I'm not entirely sure what is the goal of the operator of this account, but it seems to be working.  The photos on bot's account page have hundreds of favorites and comments. 

    Also today I discovered that one of my old Flickr contacts, who used to do square landscapes and artistic model shoots has switched things up a bit.  His work looked like this years ago:

    qcmMm4L.jpg

    Iceland 2009.  Just down the street from Birgir!  (Not really.)

     

    16c1Paw.jpg

    Paris 2010. 

     

    UCj80S4.jpg

    Model in France, 2010.

     

    This guy is now posting porn.  AI generated porn.  Of thick black women.  Initially I thought they were real, but AI's "uncanny valley" lighting almost invariably gives itself away.  NSFW: This one has a "bo-ob."  It's a really weird time to be alive.

  7. It's true that black and white print film has no equals when it comes to capturing and reproducing a wide dynamic range of values.  It's also true that at LEAST half the work with B&W film is in the darkroom, making prints.  Ansel Adams was an undisputed master of this process.  Henri Cartier-Bresson claimed to be allergic to developer chemicals and had other people do the work for him.  I've never shot, developed nor printed B&W print film, so I am in no position to talk shit.

    So anyway, there's this fake-ass B&W film that Kodak used to make called BW400CN.  It's black and white film that is developed the same way color print film is done.  Meaning it's easy for scrubs who don't have access to a darkroom, and a total gamble as far as results go.  Also, I have great beginner's luck followed by a roller coaster plunge.

     

    ulC94Hd.jpg

    Let's come out of the gate swinging.  This is one of the best shots I've ever taken and will ever take.  The inside of the Edgartown lighthouse, 07/28/08 - 3:43PM.  17-40L at the wide end, Canon Rebel K2, Kodak BW400CN.  This shot is lightning in a bottle.

     

    G5B6mPy.jpg

    Here's the underside of that same bottle.

     

    PgBtfmj.jpg

    Looking out the porthole.

     

    HfzKiIt.jpg

    This photogenic little trustafarian fuck blew out my surf guitar amp, returned it to me broken, and then de-friended me on Facebook.  Kodak Rebel G, Kodak BW400CN, and the mighty Meyer-Optik Orestor 135mm F/2.8 showing off why it's a "bokeh monster."

     

    Qr1RjKH.jpg

    My friend Alyssa's patented look of disapproval.  5/25/08 - 7:00AM at the breakfast diner.  EOS Rebel K2, EF 85mm F/1.8.  Kodak BW400CN.

    Okay, let's drop that other shoe, shall we?

    2e52v80.jpg

    02/22/09 - 5:04PM - 17-40mm @ 17mm, F/8, 1/45th.  Rebel K2.  Kodak BW400CN.  This is an absolute nightmare.  The soup nazi says "No midtones for you!"

     

    2O9OsOD.jpg

    The ancestral cottage on MV, 09/15/09 - 5:34PM - 17-40L @ 17mm, F/9.5, 1/180th, Kodak BW400CN.  This one is actually one of the better frames from the second two rolls. 

     

    ggNFsSw.jpg

    10/04/09 - 5:25PM - 17-40L @ 17mm, F/13, 1/30th, Rebel K2, BW400CN.  The lack of midtones and detail in general is appalling.  I actually like the composition of the shot, even if my dumb ass had the lens hood on the wrong way.  See that black bit in the upper left corner?

     

    FXHRBQG.jpg

    Memento Mori.  10/06/09 - 5:43PM.  Rebel K2.  Kodak BW400CN.  The mushroom cloud laying motherfucker of a lens that is the Canon EF 85mm F/1.2L II @ F/2, 1/2000th.  I had to stop down because the poor Rebel K2 said "bro, I can't move my shutter fast enough to compensate for that much light!"  Leave it to a bad BW400CN run to wreck 85L bokeh.

     

    mojAgCR.jpg

    The road where hopes for midtones go to die.  03/06/09 - 5:19PM - 17-40mm @ 24mm, F/13, 1/350th.  I have a bunch more, but I've made my point.  I still have one last roll of BW400CN, some 14 years later.  I dunno if I can be arsed to expose it.  At this point I'd rather attempt to develop Tri-X in my bathroom.

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.