Jump to content

nmculbreth

High Rollers
  • Posts

    77
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by nmculbreth

  1. Enough is enough. At first everyone had to get it out of their system which is fine, but this crap has gone on long enough. Do you think people really want to read thread after thread gangbanging rsa or some idiot on head-fi? Even after the most annoying head-fier thread was locked nobody seems to get the message, and instead start threads that either turn into or are indirectly criticizing head-fi or it's members in some way.

    Do you people think you're so damn better than head-fi? I have news for you, reading your stupid whining about head-fi is worse than just going out and reading head-fi itself. The signal to noise ratio is getting absurd in here. It's an insult to Reks and tkam, who put so much effort into making a better headphone site.

    I understand that you disagree with various things about the headphone world, but it's pretty obvious everyone here is aware of it already, so stop bitching about it and contribute something constructive. If you don't you might as well go back to head-fi.

    Judging by the most popular threads on this message board most people do want to read Head-Fi / RSA related topics. Personally I don't really see the virtue of spending time on message board which is seemingly dedicated to whining about / commenting on a different message board but as always different strokes or different folks. I check in periodically to see if anything new is happening but it always just seems like more of the same old thing...

  2. Any further details ... like start/ end times. Are we going to do a roll call to verify who is coming? I am not sure how many know about the meet since it was deleted on head-fi. Do nmculbreth, go_vtech etc... know about the meet?

    I don't think I'm going to be able to attend this meet. I'm trying to re-arrange my work schedule to get off on Saturday but as of right now it isn't looking too promising.

  3. What current production Audio Technica headphones are closest in sonic signature to the leatherhead? Basically: a nice extended frequency response in both bass and high frequencies, no weird humps or lumps (at least, not extremely so); closed; smooth in the midrange, really smoov.

    ATH-W5000?

    I missed the boat on the leatherhead, and am regretting it. Yes, I could buy used, but in the meantime...

    Nothing which AT is currently producing has a similar sound signature to the leatherhead. The W10VTG and W11JPN have a similar sound signature but neither have the same technical ability of the L3000. Since both were only released in Japan and were discontinued/sold out a long time ago they're kind of hard to find, if you keep your eyes open on Head-Fi and Rinkya you should be able to eventually come across a VTG, the JPN is much more difficult to track down.

  4. Great, more gear to lust after.... :)

    This is definately outside of my budget for the forseeable future but I'm really curious to see how it sounds. I love my APL DV-563a and Todd's APL SACD 1000 sounds outstanding as well so I would assume the new DAC has the same APL magic.

  5. In a nutshell.... natural sounding treble with excellent extension, slightly forward midrange with a little bit of warmth, deep textured bass. The soundstage isn't quite as large as the HD-650 but it's instrument placement is far more precise, it definately doesn't suffer from the three blob effect. The sound signature is on the bright side of neutral but is never harsh or bright. The PRaT is outstanding.

  6. Each woody is limited edition, the only question is whether they're limited by time or number. This is because audio-technica discontinues its lines so quickly. And unlike other manufacturers (e.g., Musical Fidelity) that do similar rapid releases and product life styles, the newer ATH-W models are often not improvements on the older ones. This functionally makes each woody a limited edition for purposes of acquisition and collectability.

    The only non-special woodies right now are the W1000 and W5000. But the latter will become special within a year or two, and the former, well, let's just hope it fades into history. :D

    Best,

    -Jason

    I agree completely. I've owned a number of different AT headphones at one point in time and they all had different sound signatures and aesthetics which made them unique. I'm definately looking forward to what AT has come up with for the 45th anniversary addition.

  7. no word on how the pricing will affect the rest of the lineup. i'm guessing prices for other cans won't change, because none are currently near the 1K mark and they are comfy in their own price niche still.

    the new pads still touch HUGE earlobes a bit, but for the most part the pads are big enough to actually rest on your head, not your ears, so your lobes actually don't touch anything but air. so yes the pads are circumaural in structure, but the foam is still the open airy supraaural type.

    I figured that RS-whatever's introduction wouldn't cause a decrease in the price of the rest of the lineup, but I was still curious. It's kind of interesting that the pricepoint(s) of Grado headphones remain is fixed while other companies decrease their prices over time. Regardless this looks interesting since it seems that it addresses my two biggest complaints about the RS-1: the lack of soundstage and the supra-aural design. I'm volunteering Rex to purchase a pair so I can give them a listen. :)

  8. Interesting. From what I've read it probably isn't my cup of tea but I'd certainly like to be able to listen to one at some point in time. What is the deal on the new pads, do they make the headpone circumaural or are they superaural like the rest of the Grado lineup?

    The $1000 pricepoint seems a little high, though I suppose this is pretty relative. Any word on how this will affect the MSRP on the rest of the Grado lineup?

  9. I'm not sure this is true. Many fiscal conservatives have a major problem with the current administration.

    How is this possible? I've never understood this, since the Whigs collapsed, the two current major parties have a long history to go by. Although there's been some changing over the years (on "states rights" they flip-flopped if you go back to the Civil War), from at the very least FDR and the New Deal on, the parties have been not very inconsistent (the Dixiecrats may be an exception). And you don't rise to power without pleasing the party (most obvious recent example is John McCains ugly transformation into a Bush apologist).

    About the only thing I liked about the Reagan administration is I thought I got the worst president of my lifetime out of the way early. Was I wrong.

    Another question that may be asked is if the Democrats continue their recent aimless pussyfooting, who will abandon them and vote Green, etc. next election hoping to create a party with a backbone?

    There are many fiscal conservatives weren't happy with Bush winning the nomination in 2000 because of his neo-Con agenda, that said they still voted Republican and most likely will continue to do so. Who else would they vote for? They're certainly not going to vote Democrat so unless they decide to vote Libertarian I don't see this base being a problem for the Republicans.

    The Congressional Democrats don't have a collective backbone but behind the scenes I think Dean is doing a pretty good job as head of the DNC. Right now the party is doing well with it's fund raising and setting up a grassroots infrastructure, I'll be interested to see how much their effort pays off this fall.

  10. Interesting question, the Republicans are still very strong with their core base but they could have a lot of problems with moderates and undecided voters. The key for the Democrats is to get this undecided group motivated to vote, if they're unable to mobilize this group I don't think they'll make the gains they need to in order to take back control of Congress. As an interesting side-note historically the President's approval ratings tend to drop in the second year of his term and often the opposing party ends up picking up more seats in Congress as a result. President Bush did not experience this phenomenon due to his huge spike in popularity following 9/11 but it's safe to say he's feeling the full force this time around. Should make for an interesting midterm.

  11. Thats the NU gray glass tube. NU made them for other companies, like Philco, just like sylvania did. Philco never actually produced any tubes of any kind. If the NU tubes are taller your sylvania tubes are short bottle tubes. From my research only NU and sylvanai made the 7n7. All 7n7's, regardless of the brand, are from these two companies. But the NU tubes are rare as they were only made up until the very early 1950's ... if that long.

    Thanks for the response Earl, I figured from your previous description that the Philco branded tubes were actually NU 7n7s but I wanted to make sure. The Sylvanias that I received are all the short bottle version but internally only one of them matches the triangular plate 7n7 tube you gave me. One of the short Sylvanias gray glass as well so I can't really tell what it looks like internally but the third has a plate structure which looks similar to the Sylvania VT-231. I haven't had a chance to do much critical listening but so far it seems the Sylvania with the same internal structure as the VT-231 does sound better then the triangular plate version.

    At this point though the NU 7n7 is definately the star of the group, it sounds better then the triangular plate Sylvania in pretty much every regard. I'm going to have to spend some more time with the tube but so far it sounds very good. I think I'm going call my guy to see if he has any more of them sitting around.

  12. Earl, is there any chance you could give me a better physical description of the NU 7n7. Among the tubes I recieved are two strange Philco labelled tubes which don't look anything like the Sylvanias. They're taller, gray glass and round plates.

  13. Earl, that's exactly what I needed to know.

    I'm assuming that the 7n7 you loaned me would be short bottle version, right? I've spent the past couple days listening doing some critical listening with the 7n7 in my system and I don't think the short-bottle is my cup of tea. I was about ready to write off the entire family but it looks like I should try to find one of the long bottle 7n7s before passing any judgement. The Sylvania VT-231 is my reference gain tube so if I could find a 7n7 with a similar sound I'd be very happy.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.