humanflyz Posted January 23, 2007 Report Share Posted January 23, 2007 http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/22/business/media/22porn.html?pagewanted=1&_r=2&ref=technology Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aerius Posted January 23, 2007 Report Share Posted January 23, 2007 Gee, maybe they should rethink those extreme closeups? It's porn, not an anatomy lesson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSloth Posted January 23, 2007 Report Share Posted January 23, 2007 It highlights a very important problem that poor unsuspecting porn stars experience - razor burn shown up by the camera. Perhaps there should be a charity to help alleviate their suffering? Or perhaps they should be slightly less zealous with their use in the first place. Maybe I'm the only person who doesn't think women make themselves sexier by attempting to look pre-pubescent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiberian Posted January 23, 2007 Report Share Posted January 23, 2007 It highlights a very important problem that poor unsuspecting porn stars experience - razor burn shown up by the camera. Perhaps there should be a charity to help alleviate their suffering? Or perhaps they should be slightly less zealous with their use in the first place. Maybe I'm the only person who doesn't think women make themselves sexier by attempting to look pre-pubescent. no you are not. hahahaha. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusty Chalk Posted January 23, 2007 Report Share Posted January 23, 2007 Sony on Porn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.