Jump to content

...as if we didn't know Head-fi was the home of the shills...


Recommended Posts

If anybody thinks I won't say something to them in person...well you'd think wrong.  :lol:

As for HF, well it is run by shills so things are never going to change but what they might be upset about is shitheads like this one cutting into their bottom line. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Every now and then I receive emails where people want free review samples or some stupid shit like that.  Now then this gem showed up today: I just like the blatant offer to offer promotion and

You can't have it both ways.  If you're writing reviews that are read by "thousands" and you are receiving discounts on the products you review, then that is a material connection to the manufacturer

So the guy is going to attend the Atlanta meet that Colin and Brent will also be attending. I told Brent to offer "Shill-an" a 40% discount on a kick in the ass.

On 4/22/2017 at 2:48 PM, spritzer said:

I write reviews read by thousands of people on headfi and I usually cross post to other audio forums too. Not to brag too much but I think I have a gifted writing style and able to transmit what I hear into a well written review and I

 

You can't have it both ways.  If you're writing reviews that are read by "thousands" and you are receiving discounts on the products you review, then that is a material connection to the manufacturer that must be disclosed.  And you're not doing this for free.  If you receive a discount, then you are in fact being compensated to the tune of the amount of said discount.  People may be making buying decisions based on your reviews (for better or for worse).  Accordingly, you have a duty to disclose anything that might affect the credibility of your review. Fortunately, this is all rather easily solved by simple, clear, conspicuous disclosure.  When people balk at such disclosure, I get very, very suspicious about motives.  But who cares what I think.  The FTC on the other hand...

I recommend familiarizing yourself with the FTC's 2009 guidelines on endorsements (attached hereto) and the recent guidance it disseminated regarding same.  The FTC has made it very clear what the rules are and how to comply.  I'll get you started.  Example 7 concerning Section 255.5 seems particularly apt to me:

  • Example 7 (section 255.5 disclosure of material connections): A college student who has earned a reputation as a video game expert maintains a personal weblog or “blog” where he posts entries about his gaming experiences. Readers of his blog frequently seek his opinions about video game hardware and software. As it has done in the past, the manufacturer of a newly released video game system sends the student a free copy of the system and asks him to write about it on his blog. He tests the new gaming system and writes a favorable review. Because his review is disseminated via a form of consumer-generated media in which his relationship to the advertiser is not inherently obvious, readers are unlikely to know that he has received the video game system free of charge in exchange for his review of the product, and given the value of the video game system, this fact likely would materially affect the credibility they attach to his endorsement. Accordingly, the blogger should clearly and conspicuously disclose that he received the gaming system free of charge. The manufacturer should advise him at the time it provides the gaming system that this connection should bedisclosed, and it should have procedures in place to try to monitor his postings for compliance.

I've written reviews in the past.  Like you, I also have a day job and do it for "fun." (Though I sometimes get paid cash money by the publication.)  So these rules apply to me, as well.  I try to disclose as much as possible any material connections; it is always on my mind for the simple reason that I don't enjoy misleading people.  And I think I can probably improve on it, as well. 

Ignore this stuff at your peril.

 

ETA: Also, I'm curious what your policy is regarding the resale of the gear on which you receive a discount.  If/when you sell such gear, do you set the price based on retail or the price you paid?  In other words, do you try to turn a profit?  My personal policy is not to accept more than what I actually paid. However, I guess if it were some sort of collector's item that had an unforeseeable increase in value, I could see reaping the benefit of that.

091005revisedendorsementguides.pdf

  • Like 18
Link to post
Share on other sites

^ He may not spend a lot of time here anymore, but when he does post something it's good damned stuff!

Brilliant reply oh lord of primates!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Went over to the HF thread and someone is still maintaining this is SOTA, yada yada...

Took a look at the company, and... Italian. Hmmm, Rudi?

Looked back on HF and I see our old friend Nik had messed about with an Angstrom preamp back in the day (didn't read the thread(s)). Good times :kitty:

Link to post
Share on other sites

if by rudi you mean rudistor, then no way. that moron could not come up with something like this.

state of the art with the balanced input going unbalanced thru the transformer then 6cg7 in circlotron mode ac coupled in and (hard to tell) transformer output. massively fucked crap.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...