postjack Posted June 15, 2008 Report Share Posted June 15, 2008 DAC1 PRE - Benchmark Media Systems, Inc. I have never heard a DAC1, and I get the impression that they are generally frowned upon here at Head-Case, while the rest of the audio world seems to be impressed. The review of the new Benchmark DAC1 PRE in the most recent Hi-Fi news was nothing short of glowing. Ken Kessler couldn't seem to find enough good things to say about this unit, including that it made one recording "...sound as lush and room-filling as a mint original vinyl pressing." So anyone heard one of these? Its level of functionality truly is enticing at its price tag of $1575. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slwiser Posted June 15, 2008 Report Share Posted June 15, 2008 They need to charge 2495$ per unit so that it could be called a high end DAC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tkam Posted June 15, 2008 Report Share Posted June 15, 2008 Ken Kessler couldn't seem to find enough good things to say about this unit, including that it made one recording "...sound as lush and room-filling as a mint original vinyl pressing." A dac1 thats warm? Unless the dac1 pre is significantly different than previous dac1's I'd have to question his definition of "warm". I don't think the dac1 is a bad dac, I just find it to be bright and at times thin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salt Peanuts Posted June 15, 2008 Report Share Posted June 15, 2008 I don't think the dac1 is a bad dac, I just find it to be bright and at times thin. That mirrors my past experiences with the DAC1 as well. Now if they did actually make some significant changes, I'd like to try it out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tkam Posted June 15, 2008 Report Share Posted June 15, 2008 From what I can see the dac1 pre is just the dac1 usb + analog inputs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusty Chalk Posted June 15, 2008 Report Share Posted June 15, 2008 A dac1 thats warm? Unless the dac1 pre is significantly different than previous dac1's I'd have to question his definition of "warm". I don't think the dac1 is a bad dac, I just find it to be bright and at times thin.Sounds like an impedance mismatch -- this doesn't sound like my experience at all. I did find it detailed -- maybe not the warmest DAC I've ever heard, but nice and accurate. Of course, it was competing with a Rega Planet, whose sound I prefer to most everything else at that price range. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milkpowder Posted June 16, 2008 Report Share Posted June 16, 2008 They need to charge 2495$ per unit so that it could be called a high end DAC. Naa... $2k is enough:p Jokes aside, what's wrong with the DAC1? It's very well received by the studio/mastering crowd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
postjack Posted June 16, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 16, 2008 Naa... $2k is enough:p Jokes aside, what's wrong with the DAC1? It's very well received by the studio/mastering crowd. The big complaint I always here is that its bright and thin. I'd love to hear one myself someday to decide. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Monkey Posted June 16, 2008 Report Share Posted June 16, 2008 I like the DAC1, but agree that it tends to the bright side. It makes a nice combo with a warmish/lush amp. The headphone out, however, is crap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aardvark baguette Posted June 16, 2008 Report Share Posted June 16, 2008 You could probably score a used Bel Canto DAC3 for a similar price Should be less bright, but similar in detail, as far as I can tell from reviews. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Monkey Posted June 16, 2008 Report Share Posted June 16, 2008 I think "merely pretty good" is a good way to put it. It's a decent and resolving DAC, that also has some nice Swiss Army knife-like flexibility. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusty Chalk Posted June 16, 2008 Report Share Posted June 16, 2008 Yeah, I agree, that's probably a better way of saying it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iron_Dreamer Posted June 17, 2008 Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 [snore] Now it's basically a Grace 902 with a better DAC, worse headphone amp, and worse ergonomics/fit and finish. Woohoo! But if you have everyone convinced that the DAC1's level of performance as a DAC is "good enough" for the price, why bother improving it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elephas Posted June 17, 2008 Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 They need to charge 2495$ per unit so that it could be called a high end DAC. Do you think it will sell as well at that price? I also have a Lavry DA10. It is good, no doubt, and I think it is a great value. But do you think Dan Lavry would keep selling the Lavry Gold DA2002 (and use it himself at home) if the DA10 was as good as it gets? I've heard the DA2002, and it sounded sublime. I don't think the DA10 or Benchmark DAC1 are sublime. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slwiser Posted June 17, 2008 Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 Do you think it will sell as well at that price? Not as many as they do now, of course. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voltron Posted April 9, 2009 Report Share Posted April 9, 2009 FOR IMMEDIATE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Benchmark Media Unveils Their Flagship DAC1 HDR with Remote Control SYRACUSE, New York, April 09, 2009 - Benchmark Media Systems, the designers of the award-winning DAC1 family, has announced the release of their flagship stereo preamplifier, the DAC1 HDR. The DAC1 HDR incorporates several of Benchmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
postjack Posted April 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 10, 2009 wow, a motor driven pot. how innovative. yeah but it probably uses innovative jitter reduction drivers that reduce digital motor driven pot jitter jitters by 100,000 jitterwatts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Monkey Posted April 10, 2009 Report Share Posted April 10, 2009 You'd think they'd at least improve the HP out with all these revisions aimed at the home user. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
postjack Posted April 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 10, 2009 You'd think they'd at least improve the HP out with all these revisions aimed at the home user. i often find myself hoping they take some of the jitters out of the HP out jitter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
postjack Posted April 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 10, 2009 stop it, you're giving me the jitters! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morphsci Posted April 10, 2009 Report Share Posted April 10, 2009 but i thought jitter was homeopathic, so if you dilute it and then shake it, it gets more jittery. Only if you dilute it to Avogadro's number. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.