Jump to content

Optical vs. Coaxial cables...


PFKMan23

Recommended Posts

I didn?t say that Optical was inferior to Coaxial. What I said was that TOS Link was inferior.

I?ve been told that the basic problem is that TOS does not use glass, and that it does not have the bandwidth to do the job well, plus the connector does not provide a good interface. Whether this is true, I don?t know. I have however done several comparisons (Years ago) where TOS was handily beaten by every other format.

Best to Worst.

1)ATT Fiber Optic (real glass with a premium connection) Almost never used any more. Very expensive.

2)AES/EBU 110 Ohm digital cable XLR?s

3)SPDIF Coax with BNC?s

4)SPDIF Coax with RCA?s

5)TOS Link

In my experience the difference between #5 and #4 is greater than the difference between #4 and #1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My mistake then, TOSlink, not necessarily optical (I thought those were synonymous)... In any case maybe I'll just have to geta decent coax cable and hear for myself...

toslink is always optical.

though fiber optics don't always use the toslink interface ; ).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toslink

Some materials are better at propegating light then others. Alot of people say glass is better, and most TOSlinks are made of a plastic/glass material, or a cheaper plastic. Real glass fiber optic cable is much more expensive , usually reserved for telecom type applications.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.