Tachikoma Posted May 30, 2009 Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 After a little more googling it gets even better: [url=http://www.cndiyclub.com/bbs/read.php?tid=15606&page=1&fpage=5]ULTRA ANALOG D20400 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
feckn_eejit Posted May 30, 2009 Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 This can't be true because I don't own one -- things can only turn out to be totally fucked up rip offs if I have bought them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tachikoma Posted May 30, 2009 Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 I'm a little torn here, to be honest. Yes, it does look like a rip-off if you look at the parts they're actually using in there, but fuck me what an engineering achievement this is. They've made something that's literally audiophile legend now, using two DACs which were designated as low cost parts at its heart. Then again, the "discrete ladder" that accounts for the remaining 8 bits couldn't have been that easy to build, could it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deepak Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 Since this seems like the mini UltraAnalog discussion, I'll go ahead and ask, does anyone know if Dan Lavry designed the UltraAnalog D20400A DAC? Someone "in the know" has said this. I'll probably message him to confirm, but thought I'd stir something up here first Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XXII Posted September 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 Well according to the man himself, he did design it: Lavry Engineering One of my designs was taken from Analog Solutions by Dick Powerswhen the audio division was closed. He started a company called Ultra Analog that manufactured my DAC module under the name DAC D20400. This device was sold to OEMs Wadia, Pacific Microsonics, Mark Levinson and others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icarium Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 Huh interesting.. I wonder how it differs from the discrete dacs used in his top end products.. perhaps they are an earlier design and he's made refinements. Either way.. solid ass chip I wish I had dick powers. Yeah I'm a terrible human being, but I had to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deepak Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 Thanks for posting that, maybe the second piece of info he told me is true as well then Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icarium Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 What is the second piece of info! I must know! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dreamwhisper Posted September 19, 2009 Report Share Posted September 19, 2009 So wait, does this mean that some of Lavry's designs are good then? I didn't like the DA10, but maybe some of his higher end DAC's are awesome. either that or the DAC D20400 was just a lucky break... On another note, I'm enjoying the SFD2 mk2 I bought recently. I can tell that it is far more high end than any headphones and amps that I currently own. It's like there's musicality hidden away, waiting to be given the chance to shine. I bet Stax would do it. For now, I'm gonna do a comparison with the 1100hd on my Mackies. I'll check back with y'all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grawk Posted September 19, 2009 Report Share Posted September 19, 2009 by all reports, his other dacs are spectacular. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tachikoma Posted September 19, 2009 Report Share Posted September 19, 2009 So wait, does this mean that some of Lavry's designs are good then? I didn't like the DA10, but maybe some of his higher end DAC's are awesome. Lavry's lower end products only uses off the shelf parts (the DA10 uses an AD1955 I think), so I wouldn't expect much from those. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dreamwhisper Posted September 25, 2009 Report Share Posted September 25, 2009 Weird, it says here: SFD 2 MKII ..that the SFD2 mk2 has a discrete analog output stage ANALOG OUTPUT STAGE One of the greatest weaknesses in most digital processor products has been their output stage. Other processors - which use solid state op-amps (since they are inexpensive and easy to implement) in the current to voltage, output and active filtering stages - suffer from the typical "glare" and "leanness" which has plagued digital reproduction since its inception. We could not limit the performance capability of the SFD-2 MKII by building an analog stage which could not match the musical innovations of our revolutionary digital stage. First of all, analog filtering was performed passively in order to maximize sonic performance. In addition, the output section was of discrete design (no op-amps), utilizing a high speed vacuum tube output buffer stage (cathode follower configuration), instead of solid state devices. I also have a question. Any idea if the SFD2 mk2 is switchable to 220 volts? Mine is at 120 right now, and there is an interested buyer in Russia. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
feckn_eejit Posted September 25, 2009 Report Share Posted September 25, 2009 Would be interesting to see pics of the digital (middle) board in your Mk.II... my Mk.III definitely has OPA627s after the PCM1704s! Out of curiosity, you have an original Mk.II or upgraded Mk.I? (upgraded would have a toggle switch with three positions on the front for input selection, original Mk.II would have a button to cycle through five inputs) Not dead easy to convert to 220V. New transfos, at least... see PM re Russia guy btw. Cheers, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dreamwhisper Posted September 25, 2009 Report Share Posted September 25, 2009 yeah it's an upgraded MKI, there's a toggle switch. it's unfortunate too, because I could use an optical input at times (a real one, not AT&T optical, whatever the hell that is) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Monkey Posted September 25, 2009 Report Share Posted September 25, 2009 Is the SFD-1 supposed to be any good? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
feckn_eejit Posted September 25, 2009 Report Share Posted September 25, 2009 yeah it's an upgraded MKI, there's a toggle switch. it's unfortunate too, because I could use an optical input at times (a real one, not AT&T optical, whatever the hell that is)Mine started as a Mk.I as well, and was then upgraded to Mk.II and finally Mk.III. You need a D2D-1 (or a Genesis Digital Lens...) for Toslink....makes it actually palatable! ST optical is actually a great interface........ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XXII Posted September 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2009 Is the SFD-1 supposed to be any good? I heard that it was supposed to be significantly worse than the SFD-2...but the Audiogon one is selling for a really incredible price. I would have gone for it if it was 220V. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
feckn_eejit Posted September 25, 2009 Report Share Posted September 25, 2009 I bet one could do quite a bit better for $350......... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.