Jump to content

Top Gear


Edwood

Recommended Posts

The last race didn't have the tension or intrigue that the old ones did either. =/

Problem is that they are now paying Clarkson, Hammond and May so much that they have no money left over for big stunts like the Reliant Robin space shuttle launch. Clarkson earned £1m from his general BBC contract and another £819k from Top Gear last year. Add that to the half million plus each that Hammond and May get, for a total salary bill of near enough £3m.

Nothing like Kelsey Grammer's $1.6m per episode of Frasier, but more than enough to cramp they style of a UK motoring show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maybe Top Gear should run advertisements. :)

Nice idea - but Top Gear is a BBC show, and the BBC have never broadcast advertisements. The Beeb is funded by the Television License Fee (£145 per year), which all TV owners have to pay by law http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/about/legislation-and-policy-AB9/ . Part of which is what is used to pay Clarkson's wage.

Massive advantage is of course no commercial breaks - just end to end uninterrupted TV.

All other TV channels broadcast in the UK (the many hundreds of them) self fund through advertising or sponsorship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just give me more cheap car challenges, trans-national (if not continental) adventures, and DIY vehicles. Big goofs like the Reliant rocket/car darts/caravan conkers/etc. are amusing enough, but aren't, for me at least, the core of what makes Top Gear so appealing. I don't really care how much money they do or don't make, unless it does get to the point where the show goes to poo. Which it hasn't yet, at least IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

What? Top Gear fabricated? No! (insert sarcastic shocked expression here)

Considering TG's apparent pro-British anti-everything else bias (especially anti-American) and penchant for fabricating, well, just about anything, it was only a matter of time. However in the interest of free speech I will side with TG on this. People should know better than to take them seriously. Plus as the article said, it stinks more of a PR move on Tesla's part.

I think the whole Hawk Stratos debacle was far more telling of how TG operates (from what I've gathered, they instructed the Stig to spin the car twice and recover on the timed lap, plus there's a strong possibility that they intentionally sabotaged the car's brakes and generally portrayed it as a bucket of bolts built in a shack when really it wasn't. Of course the difference here is, Hawk was a small-scale manufacturer that got more sales and publicity from TG whereas Tesla may very well have lost money).

To me the current Top Gear is like an old annoying but somehow lovable dog. It shits on your carpet and doesn't remember its own name anymore but somehow you can't get (too) mad at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.