Jump to content

General DAC Questions/Tech Thread


The Monkey

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 255
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Because if your DAC is a true balanced design and you take just the "hot", you are listening to half its circuit. With a transformer you have the full thing working converted to single end.

But what is the benefit of this, if all you need is single ended output? Just higher output?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just get a pair of standard XLR-to-RCA adapters, unscrew the XLR end and cut the thin wire shorting pin 3 (negative) and pin 1 (chassis ground).

My XLR-to-RCA adapters were wired this way. When I used them on the balanced outputs of my Weiss DAC1-MK2 they added a lot of distortion to the output. Thankfully no damage was caused since both outputs are short circuit-proof. I became fully aware of this issue when I approached the creator of my DAC:

If the XLR-to-RCA adapter shorts pin 3 (or pin 2) to ground then one of the DAC1-MK2's output amplifiers is shorted, which can cause distortion also in the unshorted output because of the high currents flowing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Technically noise rejection as well. Though I'm not a huge fan of transformers in the signal path.

Mmm... Something for my 'to do' list (oh how I miss my Palm btw!) id this AB test:

-'A' is the balanced out of my Pass D1 (it does use 2 chips per channel, one PCM63K 'hot' and another 'cold'), transformed (via Jensen trafo) to unbalanced.

-'B' is the single-ended out of the Pass D1 (just one PCM63K, the 'hot' of the balanced signal).

My bet is 'A' should sound better.

If I do the same experiment with my Benchmark (the XLR outs are sourced from unbalanced signals with the help of some opamps) my bet, then, is 'B' should sound better.

qed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me, it's more than a theoretical dislike. From a practical standpoint, you can end up with undesireable component interaction and distortion as a result. I find them acceptable when it's the best option for a given task, but if I can avoid it by redesign, so long as I don't end up with worse performance, I'll probably go that route.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think at face value that trafos are anything more evil than tons of other stuff you're likely to find in the signal path.

I was walking down the signal path once, and I saw this wolf. He wanted to help me find my Grandma's house. But something made me feel uneasy. So I took my gun out from my picnic basket and pumped lead into his ass.

Oh, I didn't see any transformers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same here, theoretical dislike really. It's a trasformer, it has both phase and frequency response, usually introduces some noise, and is definitely not entirely passive. Hence not a big fan. Haven't really heard any transformer balanced stuff in detail (heard Dans M3 and liked it, but that was not in detail).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not entirely unlike a discrete single ended to balanced converter, huh? :) We've sorta come full circle.

Considering the measured noise/frequency/phase performance on the discrete (or even active) SE -> balanced designs out there I'll take my chances with silicon.

Last time I looked at audio transformers the THD/frequency response didn't look to promising and it still doesn't:

http://www.rane.com/pdf/bb44xdat.pdf

I don't know if that's a "good quality" transformer but the Rane transformer stuff is very common in the studio as I understand it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering the measured noise/frequency/phase performance on the discrete (or even active) SE -> balanced designs out there I'll take my chances with silicon.

From the discrete designs (nevermind the monolithic designs) I've built and tested it might be higher than you think, at least that's what I've measured.

The transformer design I'm using on my preamp has a measure < 1 degree phase shift at 20Hz. THD+N is < .0005% at 1kHz. Response is varies by a maximum of 0.02dB at 20Hz. Again, all this is very dependent on the load, but since I control this parameter (a fixed input impedance, stepped attenuator follows the transformer), that's rather easy.

I'd be glad to compare this to some discrete designs of your choosing, but these numbers are pretty much down in the noise. They may be even better than this, I just cannot measure it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the discrete designs (nevermind the monolithic designs) .... snip

I haven't tested either myself (I don't own any AP stuff) but the numbers you quote sound excellent and I agree are well in the noise. The measurements I refer too are the measurements of for many of the DACs (eg Bel Canto DAC3) that convert SE to balanced using silicon.

That said I can't see how that Jensen transformer is anything but transparent. As I said I was not sure that was a good transformer and apparently it was not :palm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.