volcomjerk Posted December 11, 2006 Report Share Posted December 11, 2006 Hey guys, wanted to ask you for some advice. I'm about to make an amp purchase and I've always wanted to hear some of Justin's amps. However now I'm stuck in one of those am I making the right decision by spending this much money for the source that I have. What's my lame source? An iPod with Lossless codecs going through line out. I know its not the greatest source but it's also very hard to match the convenience of an iPod. This is mainly for office use so I'm not in the market for a portable amp anymore. I'd rather invest the money into something a little more solid. So I guess my main question is... Is the GS-1 overkill for the iPod or should I just stick with the Gilmore Lite? Also remember I can later upgrade to a better source. I was thinking more of a USB source rather than a tricked out modded cd player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grawk Posted December 11, 2006 Report Share Posted December 11, 2006 You'll definitely get improvement with a good amp, and upgrading the source later works fine. Hey guys, wanted to ask you for some advice. I'm about to make an amp purchase and I've always wanted to hear some of Justin's amps. However now I'm stuck in one of those am I making the right decision by spending this much money for the source that I have. What's my lame source? An iPod with Lossless codecs going through line out. I know its not the greatest source but it's also very hard to match the convenience of an iPod. This is mainly for office use so I'm not in the market for a portable amp anymore. I'd rather invest the money into something a little more solid. So I guess my main question is... Is the GS-1 overkill for the iPod or should I just stick with the Gilmore Lite? Also remember I can later upgrade to a better source. I was thinking more of a USB source rather than a tricked out modded cd player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
volcomjerk Posted December 11, 2006 Author Report Share Posted December 11, 2006 You don't think it's overkill with an iPod? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grawk Posted December 11, 2006 Report Share Posted December 11, 2006 That's up to you I guess. I've used a dynahi directly out of my powerbook, and it sounded better than other options I had for listening at the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSloth Posted December 11, 2006 Report Share Posted December 11, 2006 That's up to you I guess. I've used a dynahi directly out of my powerbook, and it sounded better than other options I had for listening at the time. Why not one of those sexy SE Lites w/DPS in black...? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sacd lover Posted December 12, 2006 Report Share Posted December 12, 2006 Why not one of those sexy SE Lites w/DPS in black...? I second that thought. Unless you need the preamp option I would get the Lite. You save $250 and the sound quality is going to be very close. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
recstar24 Posted December 12, 2006 Report Share Posted December 12, 2006 The Lite is a good bet - it will sound ever better if you upgrade your source, but I wouldn't necessarily say its overkill for you at the moment. And I agree those SE black lites look badass Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
volcomjerk Posted December 12, 2006 Author Report Share Posted December 12, 2006 I just ordered the Black SE Lites with the DPS. However, now I'm in the market for a good USB DAC Source around the 300 dollar range. Is the Micro DAC as good as it gets? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grawk Posted December 12, 2006 Report Share Posted December 12, 2006 I just ordered the Black SE Lites with the DPS. However, now I'm in the market for a good USB DAC Source around the 300 dollar range. Is the Micro DAC as good as it gets? Apple Airport Express is better than any usb source I've heard, if you're starting from itunes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
volcomjerk Posted December 12, 2006 Author Report Share Posted December 12, 2006 Apple Airport Express is better than any usb source I've heard, if you're starting from itunes. Wait... you're kidding right and yes I am starting from iTunes. I have no problem getting an Airport Express at all if this is true. Even better than a Micro DAC? I'm hoping for warmth since the GS Lites might lack in that department. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ojnihs Posted December 12, 2006 Report Share Posted December 12, 2006 Apple Airport Express is better than any usb source I've heard, if you're starting from itunes. I'm going to second this, the internal DAC on the AEX may not be the best, but it sounds pretty darn good for how much it costs. I have an optical cable going to a DAC-AH, but I was really happy with just the AEX before I got the DAC-AH. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
volcomjerk Posted December 12, 2006 Author Report Share Posted December 12, 2006 So wait... you are saying that a WIFI Extender / Hotspot Plug / iTunes Extender sounds better than my iPod as a DAC? This is getting very bizarre... in a good way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grawk Posted December 12, 2006 Report Share Posted December 12, 2006 Way more important than the quality of the DAC is that you're electrically isolating the dac from the computer. I've got a CEC DA53, which is a great dac and has USB in, but I still prefer to feed it from the airport instead, so that I eliminate possible interference. It's a growth path that doesn't leave you stuck with a piece of equipment you won't want later, unlike most compromise gear. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
volcomjerk Posted December 12, 2006 Author Report Share Posted December 12, 2006 Way more important than the quality of the DAC is that you're electrically isolating the dac from the computer. I've got a CEC DA53, which is a great dac and has USB in, but I still prefer to feed it from the airport instead, so that I eliminate possible interference. It's a growth path that doesn't leave you stuck with a piece of equipment you won't want later, unlike most compromise gear. I have never even thought to think of the AEX as a USB DAC... amazing... my mom has one, my dad has one and it would be the last piece of equipment I would think to have decent qualities. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grawk Posted December 12, 2006 Report Share Posted December 12, 2006 It's not a usb dac, but it's a computer source. Better, imho. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ojnihs Posted December 12, 2006 Report Share Posted December 12, 2006 It's not a usb dac, but it's a computer source. Better, imho. Definitely better. I love it, love it, love it, love it, love it, love it... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
volcomjerk Posted December 12, 2006 Author Report Share Posted December 12, 2006 This is how I feel about your suggestions Seriously $129... best advice ever thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deepak Posted December 12, 2006 Report Share Posted December 12, 2006 The Squeezebox DAC is also pretty damn good for $250/300 wired/wireless (with an alright interface once you get used to it/set up SlimServer) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSloth Posted December 12, 2006 Report Share Posted December 12, 2006 The Squeezebox DAC is also pretty damn good for $250/300 wired/wireless (with an alright interface once you get used to it/set up SlimServer) I could never get on with the Sqeezebox interface. If I have to be tethered to software, I'd rather it be iTunes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deepak Posted December 12, 2006 Report Share Posted December 12, 2006 The SB interface can be cumbersome if you have a large media library. I loved using it for internet radio stations though. I might have one of the most convoluted setups ever though (since I can't stand iTunes) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grawk Posted December 12, 2006 Report Share Posted December 12, 2006 I like itunes precisely because I have a large library. It's simple, it works, I don't have to futz with it. I don't tweak my tags, I don't fiddle with EQ settings per track, I don't build playlists. I listen with party shuffle, and when I get in a mood for something, I drop it in the playlist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deepak Posted December 12, 2006 Report Share Posted December 12, 2006 I'm sure iTunes is great on the Mac. But with a 8000+ track library with iTunes7 on PC you can count the seconds it takes to load; usually around 15-20 seconds (And no native support for FLAC, but it can now be added in with a plugin). This is on a really modern computer; Athlon 64, 2 GB ram, yada yada Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grawk Posted December 12, 2006 Report Share Posted December 12, 2006 I use mac and pc, nothing particularly modern. I get my fast computer fix at work. I just open itunes and leave it open, so I don't really care that it takes a minute to load. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
volcomjerk Posted December 12, 2006 Author Report Share Posted December 12, 2006 Plus how can you forget the CoverFlow feature and album cover retriever built in? iTunes is great if you can live without having the hardcore audiophile quirks such as FLAC and support for OGG. Other than that it really is the best one out there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deepak Posted December 12, 2006 Report Share Posted December 12, 2006 Plus how can you forget the CoverFlow feature and album cover retriever built in? iTunes is great if you can live without having the hardcore audiophile quirks such as FLAC and support for OGG. Other than that it really is the best one out there. Hardcore audiophile bullshit? Yeah when I've spent thousands on gear, I'll take a player that can at least bypass Windows kmixer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.