Correct me if I'm wrong, but the Stello was auditioned with upsampling to 192kHz. The Lavry, shown in the first pic, is set to 44kHz. I assume a CD transport was used based on the entire post (as opposed to native 96/192khz material on a PC). Wouldn't a valid comparision have both units at say 44kHz or maybe 96kHz; the max of the Lavry?
Dc
I was confused and not sure about the correct answer, hence the fact that I took the time to register here and discuss the issue, not point fingers. I apologize if you do not have the energy to do the same; two years, fours years, forty years..it's still a flawed comparison. If someone doesn't want to join yet another forum, my links are useless; I agree with your groundbreaking logic ; ) What a warm welcome....
DC
I'm confused why you say the DA-10 doesn't upsample. Maybe I have it wrong but I thought it uses a crystal for each sample rate, but can also do SRC when you throw, for example, 44kHz at it and set the DA-10 to 96kHz.
You don't mention your source either; CD tranport or PC. If PC, what sample rate was sent to the units.
Lavry Engineering :: Log in
another thread: Lavry Engineering :: Log in
DC