Jump to content

graben

Returning Member
  • Posts

    40
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by graben

  1. I have to say the SR-X MkIII Pro is really a great sounding headphone (with SRM-717 and Lavry). Very balanced from top to bottom (bass is deep and tight), phenomenal timbre, great resoution and dynamics.

    Just a hint of sharpness in the midrange. Soundstage is not big but not cramped either.

    The headband might need a bit of extra padding but otherwise the comfort is better than what I remembered, having the NB version earlier (but with a different source)

    Tonally I prefer this to the SR-007 which imho has too much bass and treble and too coloured mids. Still no SR-009 though...

    I loved my SRX MkIII Pro when I had it. I just wished it was more comfortable as it killed my ears and head wearing it. I preferred it to even a 507.

  2. Hey everyone I have been feeling an itch to to get a DAC capable of 24bit/96Khz or better. I currently have and love my Stax DAC talent. About what level of current DAC would exceed the quality of my current DAC?

    Do $500 DACs now exceed the quality of classic DACs? Or would I need to spend over $1000 or more to notice a difference?

    For those that don't know the DAC has a Burr Brown PCM63P which can do 20bit/48Khz.

    Some specs are Digital Filter: 20bit

    Oversampling: 8x

    Bit conversion: 20/16

    Total harmonic distortion:

    0.0015% (1kHz, 0dB)

    0.015% (1kHz,-20dB);

    1.5% (1kHz,-60dB)

    Frequency response: DC ... 20kHz (± 0.5dB)

    S / N ratio: 118dB

    Dynamic Range: 104dB

    Channel Separation: 120dB

  3. Here are my impressions of the 307, 407, and 507

    If you want the short version I bought the 507.

    Long version

    Take my impressions with a grain of salt as it was in a not totally quiet place. I went to my favorite Stax dealer here in Japan. I listened through a srm-600 and a srm-006TS, as well as a little on a 323s. I hated the 307 immediately, it sounded like a 404 and 303. In other words etch. The 407 and 507 were very close. Both sounded great with no etch at all. I felt there was more bass from the 507 also it felt a bit more detailed in transient notes. I would say if you are tight on money don't feel bad about the 407. It really is the best bang for the buck lambda and the sound quality is very similar to the 507. I have a small head ( I usually wore the old head band assembly as small as it would go) and the 507 feels great. My setting is 2 clicks above the smallest setting on the 507.

    Compared to the SC1 and LNS the 507 beats them both.

    Well time to get back to my 507s...

  4. I've been into mid hi-fi the last few years. I used to think my Logitech Z-5500's were the best things on the planet. Now, that I've gotten into decent headphones, I know the difference.

    Would it be a fair assessment to say that cheap / entry level headphones turn everything into a blended / muddy mess? I've found with going up a little bit in the scale of equipment that my music listening experience has greatly increased, mainly because the you can pick out where the sounds come from, and it's separation etc. (as opposed to a grinded blend of sound)

    How do you explain this to a friend that rocks ipod buds?

    Get your friend some jecklin floats and try typing fi.org instead of case.org after head- will solve all your problems.

  5. I can find very little about the Stax DAC Talent online. Has anyone here heard it and could give some impressions? I found someone selling it for about $300 U.S. dollars. Is this a reasonable price?

    After hearing all the great comments about vintage DACs I am interested in getting one.

    I listen through my Luxman amp to way too many Stax.

    I'm looking forward to your comments.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.