Jump to content

CarlSeibert

High Rollers
  • Posts

    2,512
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Posts posted by CarlSeibert

  1. At least Beats claims they'll still stream at 320 Kbps. But the cringe factor touching an app that says "Beats" Ouch. And then there's the Squeeze box issue. Does anybody know if Spotify is actually delivering the claimed stream rate? They weren't early on.

  2. Unless they get smart and repeal it in the meantime, that Florida foolishness looms in the future some time. In my case, I think it's 2016. Meanwhile, just like you - - they're so cheap I have a license with a 10 or 12 year old picture. It's not the sunshine state anymore. Now it's the silly state.

  3. Which fits nicely with the common perception that somewhere between 24/96 and 24/192 is where digital "works" . if you postulate that vinyl was evolved until it "worked", it makes a lot of sense.

    I tend to hold the notion that the same principle applies in photography. 35mm film was accepted because it was the minimum thing that generally "worked". so then you have the very fuzzy task of deciding at what point digital "works". Which certainly wasn't made any easier by the low sighted who claimed that 2MP was all the resolution that the human eye/brain could perceive and what not. It's very sad now to look at photos from that era. We we're a lot luckier in audio because a lot of the mess that was early digital was in the playback, so music from that period turned out to be just degraded, rather than lost altogether.

    • Like 1
  4. Not sure if this was mentioned yet, but whoever's in the market for these headphones should try them out in person first. I purchased a pair online and ended up returning it because the headband had a tendency to retract on its own, even when on my head.

    Good to know. Mine's fine in that regard.

  5. I find the isolation to be pretty good, about on a par with generic shop ear protectors.

    On my head. The contact area between my noggin and the top on the band could be a little bigger. (Which I think would happen if the band was a little curvier. ) it's not a big deal though, because the phones are fairly light.

  6. I have a pair of these now. I'm impressed. Timbers are very good, something that mid priced close backs don't usually do for me. Bass is yummy. Resolution is very good across the passband. There's a tiny hint of 10 kHz bump and then drop off, but the treble is really very nice. I'm allergic to brightness and I'm not hearing any. There is a solidity to the soundstage that I really like. I don't hear any ringing or noises at all. Maybe that's a big part of it - blacker background and all that.

    All around, I'm happy. They are becoming my portable headphones of choice.

    I wish the headband was arched more. The squared-off business is a mystery to me. Maybe they were going for a certain clamping geometry? Maybe Paul Barton has an outrageously square head? Maybe Tyll knows what's up. Not a deal killer in any case.

  7. Just flipping through it, taking a very very broad brush glance, it seems like his system tracks my preferences, kinda sorta, more or less. Which might suggest that you can successfully quantify your preferences. Our it might be dumb luck.

    Mystery of the moment, though, is who is the author, and what is the purpose of the PowerPoint? Inquiring minds want to know....

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.