Jump to content

obzilla

Members
  • Posts

    11
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About obzilla

  • Birthday 04/08/1978

Profile Information

  • Interests
    Chasing dragons.
  • Location
    Toronto
  • Gender
    Male

Converted

  • Location
    WTF, there is a location field above.
  • Interests
    Hifi, photography, computer animation, amateur gynaecology
  • Occupation
    Computer monkey.
  • Headphones
    LCD2.2, Omega 2 Mk2(.5)
  • Headphone Amps
    Liquid Fire, Woo GES
  • Sources
    Calyx 24/192 DAC, NAD M51
  • Other Audio Gear
    CDs??

obzilla's Achievements

Member

Member (2/6)

0

Reputation

  1. Banter from the other site had me turned off to these for a long time. Got a pair recently, lesson learned. Still honeymooning, but I'm gonna agree that they don't suck and let them be the headphone of my second rig until deemed passe. I do notice a succinct lack of personal hygiene products and bamboo shavings in the driver on certain tracks.
  2. That's right, thanks. But the point is I can identify them because they aren't really the same source, not necessarily because one has higher bit depth than the other. I have the Doors DVDA box set, do you know how that varies from the current redbooks? It would make for a decent comparison. On the Metallica DVDA all I can hear is how they fucked up nearly everything about that album that Metallica didn't fuck up when they recorded it, so after hearing it twice I have stuck with redbook.
  3. Yeah I am unaware of any extended rez on Lateralus. Without enabling an upsampling DSP effect, everything comes out at 16/44. I can easily spot the difference between Nirvana's Nevermind redbook rip, and the HDtracks 24/96 version, but they are different mixes.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.