Knuckledragger

That is one of the oldest continually updated threads. Unlike What Are You Listening To, Slow Forum, etc, it's never been 'rebooted' into a new thread. Maybe it's time for that?

Lowbrow, huh? New Mexico Attorney General Warns Against the Molesty Charms of Pedobear

Oldie but goodie:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUpwmDQ0NQY&hd=1

agile_birthday, happy_one!

Palin is trying REALLY hard not to corpse.

Thalty!

The problem with all of the consumer Canon point and shoots is that they lack manual control. You have no direct control over the shutter an aperture. To me that is UTTERLY unacceptable.

Damn, dude.

This animation looks familiar, but I have no idea what's it's from. "Fuck it, I'm not paying for a computer case."

Well, it's a compact point and shoot, so it'ss not going to have the deep bass response of a full frame DSLR or large format digital back. The F/2 maximum aperture is full a stop larger than most point and shoots so the midbass and lower mids are going to have a lot more impact than other cameras of its size. Even wide open, the lens is quite sharp corner to corner, giving it excellent imaging and high frequency response. With such a tiny sensor, the S95 is not going to have the smooth high gain (ISO) of a tube driven beast like the Nikon D3s. The dual control dials make for easy adjustments, but the camera reacts quite a bit slower than a DSLR would. I didn't take measurements, but I suspect it's slew rate isn't very good. I'm sorry, we don't give numerical scores here at KnuckleDragging Enterprises, but we rate the S95 a winner if you're not looking to pony up for the Fuji X100. Also, can I have a hit of whatever you're smoking?

I paid $299 for my S95 at AMZN a few weeks ago, FWIW.

Srs bsns geekdom.