The Monkey Posted February 20, 2008 Report Posted February 20, 2008 I'd appreciate impressions from those of you who have heard a balanced HF-1 compared to a balanced RS-2 or RS-1. Basically, I'm trying to decide if I want to move on from my HF-1.
The Monkey Posted February 21, 2008 Author Report Posted February 21, 2008 I'll take SE impressions, too.
postjack Posted February 21, 2008 Report Posted February 21, 2008 SE, HF-1 has more bass, RS-1 has more space.
postjack Posted February 21, 2008 Report Posted February 21, 2008 SE, HF-1 has more bass, RS-1 has more space. also, while the RS-1 is slightly more resolving, the HF-1 has less of an upper midrange hump. I imagine this is why grawk & others prefer the HF-1 to the RS-1.
recstar24 Posted February 21, 2008 Report Posted February 21, 2008 SE, HF-1 has more bass, RS-1 has more space. Damn, talk about breaking it down to the simplest level, couldn't have said it better myself. Very eloquent oh kind sir
The Monkey Posted February 23, 2008 Author Report Posted February 23, 2008 I've been listening to my HF-1 the last few nights and to me it sounds good, but a bit congested, which is frustrating.
postjack Posted February 23, 2008 Report Posted February 23, 2008 I've been listening to my HF-1 the last few nights and to me it sounds good, but a bit congested, which is frustrating. RS-1 might be right up your alley then.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now