Dusty Chalk Posted March 24, 2009 Report Posted March 24, 2009 So I'm seeing this, and I'm thinking to myself -- you know, I've been meaning to (ahem) laserdrop my laserdisks. Talk me down? Talk me up (I.E. should I go all the way to 1080p)? Do whut now? This coming from someone who has immediately fallen in love with blu-ray -- I may not know shit about this stuff, but I know what I like.
grawk Posted March 24, 2009 Report Posted March 24, 2009 You don't need high res to rip laserdisc, that's 480i.
grawk Posted March 24, 2009 Report Posted March 24, 2009 It's analog, sure. But it's also ntsc, so it only has 240 lines of resolution.
Duggeh Posted March 25, 2009 Report Posted March 25, 2009 Laserdisc had more than 400 lines. It was much higher quality than VHS and VHS was in the 200s.
grawk Posted March 25, 2009 Report Posted March 25, 2009 It was higher quality, but it was still PAL or NTSC.
manaox2 Posted March 25, 2009 Report Posted March 25, 2009 It was higher quality, but it was still PAL or NTSC. For some reason, all I think of when you say that is 60fps or 29.97 deinterlaced for NTSC or 25fps for PAL internally. What does frame rate have to do with the resolution?
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now