Jump to content

Jon L

High Rollers
  • Posts

    1,035
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Jon L

  1. 12 hours ago, Mach3 said:

    This compared to the LCD-4?

    I haven't really heard of any driver failure much with Abyss headphone. Any truth to this?

    I've only tried LCD-4Z and LCD-2 which certainly sound unique and enjoyable, although the often-reported driver failures and unit-to-unit sound variability means I'd rather buy something else or only buy if I find extremely good prices.  Then there is Hifiman...

    Holding the Abyss or the Raal SR1a in hand, they are built extremely well but in opposite design approaches.  Abyss employs extremely solid, thick, ceramic-coated aluminum frame to position the earpads barely touching the face.  Raal uses very thin, flexible, self-contracting frame to let the whole headphone shrink down on the head, with user adjusting the driver angle like AKG K1000.  

    As an aside, the Schiit Jotunheim R amp purpose-built to drive Raal SR1a's extremely low impedance (0.4 Ohm) CAN drive the Abyss 1266 wonderfully via DIY 4-pin female XLR to 4-pin female XLR adapter (non-standard pinout).  Quite surprising, but the combo sounds great. and I suspect whatever they did to increase current-delivery into low impedance is working well for low impedance planars by accident 😄

    49759275962_6777a2a850_c.jpg0408201821 by drjlo2, on Flickr

    • Like 2
  2. Well, no regrets in spending the money.  With TOTL headphones in these price brackets, it comes down to personal tastes.  I'm waiting to try the new kid RAAL SR1A ribbon 'phones next, but I already know that for certain music genre, Abyss will always be unbeatable.  The incredible dynamics, bass power with definition are always admired as SOTA, but the other parts such as musicality, resolution, enjoyability are pretty awesome, too.  

  3. Headphone section is just adding resistors, the number of which is determined by Jumpers on top of the board (first photo is showing top of circuit board).  

    The bottom of board shows Jupiter Copper Foil caps I rolled in place of (upgraded) Mundorf Silver/gold, and bottom right of photo shows resistor arrays for headphone output.

    It's too bad the headphone jack cannot deliver enough power for my Abyss because it would have been so much more convenient to keep my speakers hooked up to speaker posts and Abyss to front headphone jack, which automatically cuts off speaker outputs  😞

     

    0103201436.jpg

    0123201709.jpg

    • Thanks 1
  4. 58 minutes ago, dsavitsk said:

     3F is high current, low voltage and is DC coupled. (The 3 - as opposed to the 3F - uses an output transformer, but no DC blocking cap.)

    The T4 has a single ended input with a tube LTP stage for gain and splitting. The 3F has an input transformer for gain and splitting.

    3F is generally the better Focal option, but it is for balanced phones only.

    So the 3F (or 3) should be better if one happened to connect a planar to it? say Impedance in 40's sensitivity 90ish

  5. 3 hours ago, Scgorg said:

    Currently this costs about the same as L700mk2 and between those 2 picking this one (with dark pads) is a no-brainer to me.

    Hmm.  How would you compare L700 MkII vs. ES-1a?

    I've been looking for a used L700 MkI, meaning to do the BlueTak mod, since several reviews keep saying L700 is "better" than SR007 and SR009, with brightness level between the two, which would be about right for my tastes..

    • Like 1
  6. Which earpads were they ordered with?  I read the "regular" (stiff?) pads make them sound very bright and shouty.

    Per ES Lab website:

    "The memory foam pads gives a more organic tonality and a larger bass extension while the stiff pads take the tranparency of sound to the next level. Please consult us before purchase."

  7. 36 minutes ago, mwl168 said:

    To paraphrase Tyll’s comment, in the insane HiFi market today, the Focal Clear is a bargain especially at the promotional price of $1000 USD. Now I have completely lost my marble!

    Looks like the Clear is $1500 nowadays.  Looking back 10 years ago, when the reasonable best  dynamics available were Sennheiser HD580/600  with the occasional crazy person who splurged on Sony R10 behind their wife's back, I suppose it's better there are so many choices now.  

    I tend to avoid audio/headphone shows these days, but somewhere somehow Hifiman and Audeze seem to have taken over the world, and the price of TOTL headphones have reached speaker levels.  I wouldn't mind sitting down to compare Raal SR1a, Mysphere, Susvara, Utopia, Abyss, and maybe a ZMF thrown in for fun.  Where does Clear fit into that scheme of things, I wonder?

  8. My speakers are custom jobs at measured honest 95dB/7 Ohm, with bass offloaded to another amp, so even 3 watts are usually enough.  But just for fun, I have the infamous Klipsch RP-600M on their way.  It's usually a bad idea to rely too much on reviewers, but at the Klipsch's reasonable price, what the heck...

    Herb Reichert of Stereophile:

    "The EleKit and Klipsch RP-600Ms together cost only $2600, but musically and sonically satisfied me as much as if they cost $26,000. To my complete surprise, this pairing exceeded the Orangutan+SIT-3 combo in apparent speed, tightness of bass, and boogie PRaT fun factor. The TU-8600R powering the RP-600Ms, sourced by the Chord Qutest DAC ($1895), created a complete under-$6k system, including cables and stands, that I'd be hard-pressed to improve on."
     

  9. 23 hours ago, Tachikoma said:

    How does it compare to your direct drive amps? and do you have the Lundahl transformers in this unit?

    Don't have any DD amps on hand to directly compare, but I bought the Elekit to triple as speaker amp, stat amp via transformer, and to power Abyss 1266 Phi TC planars.  

    And it does have Lundahl's and Mundorf silver/gold/oil caps. (below photo from Stereophile)

    49170891618_c291f9acfc_z.jpgElekitTx by drjlo2, on Flickr

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.