kevin gilmore

if you take one of the cooper male and stick it into a real stax manufactured socket, you will find the fit extremely tight and you cant stick the plug all the way in. eventually the stax socket cracks. (queue steve) my document was created with a real stax plug (actually a few of them) and a very high resolution optical comparator. but 11.05 seems an odd number. Likely the original spec somewhere inside stax is 11.00 mm. makes the most sense. the optical comparator read everything out as X and Y which is why the conversion that should be perfect (to at least 4 digits) maybe not so perfect.

there are a couple of places that sell the same thing that are not ebay. circlotron power supply works fine for 700v, 800v etc.

was planning on using the teflon versions on ebay. but i think that ceramic one is exactly the same size.

no real reason to shrink the filament board, but go ahead and try. the output tube spacing is already at the minimum and that results in a specific board size. no reason for the filament board to be any smaller than that because all the holes need to line up. filament board stacks on the output board.

the power supply is clearly labeled as +350 and -350. so an absolute maximum of 1400 volts peak to peak stator to stator. which is 500vrms. not 630 vrms. the same as every stax amp with these power supplies. srmt1 all versions, srm717 srm727 etc. looks almost identical to the koss circuit with bipolar outputs replacing the mosfets. push pull. no idea of maximum output current. lots of opamps with huge amounts of feedback. if its cheap enough, might be worth it. probably not.

owning a z06 with a zr1 on order, i am more than happy with these results. z06 beating cars that are 3 times the price or more, seems pretty impressive. and driven by gm engineers. pretty sure a real race car driver would do quite a bit better.

chuck mangione dead at 84.

2sa1968 is in fact a PNP 900v. 2sc1968 is a 500mhz rf amplifier.

wow, you take off 2 hours to watch a movie and then all of this. if that class B output section could actually deliver 1 amp or more that is required for just about every single planar or ribbon then maybe it might actually perform correctly. but the opamp cannot possibly supply enough current to drive the output stage. all the feedback in the world won't help. and for real world loads R2 actually makes it worse. multiple feedback loops and it looks just like the squarewave of the nfca module. more like a stair step. something the AP cannot possibly measure. hint: look at the quad current dumper. class B output section. performs well within its power limit. all this to reduce the current capabilities of the power supply. all this to reduce the heat generated because the heatsinks are way to small. yes its a piece of unreliable garbage.

topping dx5ii schematic class B output stage. and they seem to be proud of this crap. discuss dx5ii.PDF

ST does not have a fab in china. but they do have a back end site in china where the silicon is cut up and packaged. so the box says made in china. Wolfspeed (formerly cree) also uses a back end site in china. which is why the c2m1000 is stamped china.

that box is 1000 pieces. the mouser price for that is $283. i cannot imagine fakes for prices that low. fake 2sj79 are going for about $15 each. which is why there are tons of fakes on ebay. the typical hfe of 200 is the only spec on the datasheet. no minimum or maximum hfe specified.

the 3rd one is the only one with the box after the cree label that matches parts i have. my parts mostly have a w13814 date code

Note, not my soldering job. battery in microscope dead too much work to get the 1:1 lens out.

i just looked at what i had in stock. F405 and F413. both work fine. logo looks printed on. not etched and not stamped either.