Jump to content

johnwmclean

High Rollers
  • Posts

    1,358
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by johnwmclean

  1. I used the C3M0350120D in both the Carbon and GRHV.

    On the bench I tested the amp boards separately and they worked fine along with the GRHV.
    In the final build with 2 amp boards connected there was oscillation which caused all sorts of odd voltages, namely 400V over the outputs and a GRHV + rail that read 8V. Funnily enough I could get the amp working with the capacitive load of a dvm killing the oscillation when probing over the GRHV outputs and I had music.

    I replaced everything back to C2M1000170D and all was stable. To be honest I haven’t done enough testing to know whether the GRHV with the C3M0350120D would be ok in the field or not. But hopefully you can gain some insight from my experience with it.

    • Like 5
  2. Finally done!

    I regrettably sold my previous KGSSHV Carbon a while ago, this one’s not going anywhere soon.

    This is a 400V, 19mA version, using the ground plane amp board, Sumr transformer and Goldpoint V47 attenuator. I bought the heatsinks from China and had all the drilling and panels done at Front Panel Express. I pulled out the Canon 5D from the cupboard for some tasty shots.

    IMG_1555.thumb.jpeg.afab016f401fd9a41c8c1f6960408bf4.jpeg

    IMG_1562.thumb.jpeg.4f0b54732a3a0002dff5462733efeea1.jpeg

    IMG_1558.thumb.jpeg.d2a31fa81b20c7bea0e853c119fbeac1.jpeg

    IMG_1556.thumb.jpeg.d49ee59ede9ea37c3d71caf137c9f9d6.jpeg

    IMG_1577.thumb.jpeg.73174d314a6ecea5d025d2c8a59457be.jpeg

    IMG_1588.thumb.jpeg.6a613dc92aefe070c90cd5ad3d2a5548.jpeg

     

    • Like 29
  3. I see 

    2 hours ago, starcat said:

    Yeah, sure kOhm (still in sailing mode, returning home tomorrow and back to amp building 🙂

    I have a T2 PCB that accepts only the DACT or the RK50 with a pre-drilled front panel as well. So, "has" to be one of the two. 

    John, what do you like on the Goldpoint V47 better? 

     

    Ok gotcha, DACT or RK50 only then.

    The Goldpoint V47 is 47 steps vs DACT 24 steps. I also prefer the wafers with PCBs vs DACTs pinouts (not an issue with your T2 pcb though). Then channel matching on either DACT or Goldpoint would be better than the RK50 as well as a lot less money. The Goldpoint feels incredibly good quality not RK50 quality, but a lot better than the DACT from my experience. I’ve also had Kozmo’s as well and was not a fan, maybe quality has improved but not willing to gamble.

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.