First off, Whitney....and of course Purrin, thanks so much for allowing us to try these headphones out on our rigs. It's a rare opportunity that I wish came around a lot more often than it does.
Below is a copy & paste from a post I just made at the "other place" regarding my initial but fairly confident findings regarding what I am hearing from the LCD-3. As usual, YMMV.
The loaner I now have in house sounds veiled compared to my Rev 2's. There is a distinct lack of transparency with these, and I believe it stems from the overly ripe low end. On Wynton Marsalis' "Live at the Village Vanguard" disc #6, there is a track called 'Brother Veal'. It opens up with what I can only describe as just about the best recording of an upright acoustic bass I have ever heard. It is front and center, has depth, beautiful rendering of the resonant tone of the strings, digs down deep and tight as a nut. If the system is up to things, the musician will be right there in the room with you.
Versus the LCD-2 rev 2, the LCD-3 portrays the bass sound as overly thick and lacking definition. The natural resonation of the instrument is audibly subdued and even the crowd interaction as the bassist rips through his solo is not nearly as pronounced and apparent.
I went through all of my favorites list that I typically utilize for evaluations, and pardoning my pun....the song remained the same. Everything had a fine sheen to it, less of a connection with the music, everything sounding a bit rounded off and slightly lacking of the rawness of certain instruments such as the human voice, and especially the raw edge of horns such as trumpets and the seductive smokiness of a tenor sax.
After about a 3 hour listening session with a few breaks thrown in, I replaced the LCD-3's with my pair of Rev 2's....and all the magic that I so crave, returned in spades.
Needless to say this particular LCD-3 is a GREAT disappointment to me. It is unclear whether or not the only thing keeping this headphone from performing at the level I had expected is the thickening up of the bass region, which in my mind is intruding upon everything above its spectrum. About the only things I'd say it has over the rev 2 is that it is more comfortable to wear long-term due to the much softer ear cups, and the different angling of the connectors helps to keep the cables off of your chest. If what I am hearing is the result of poor quality control, and there are LCD-3's out there giving a much different sonic presentation, then they apparently need a tighter rein on things at Audeze.
My playback system from soup to nuts was as follows:
Source: HP Elitebook 8460P Core i7 2620M @ 3.4ghz 8MB, 160GB SSD (running in battery mode)
Player: JPLAY in FullScale Hibernation mode
DAC: Meitner MA-1 (plugged into an Acoustic Revive RTP-2 Ultimate conditioner w/Tel Wire power cord)
Amplifiers: VTL IT-85 (single-ended), 4ch Beta 22 (balanced) (both amps plugged straight into the wall with LessLoss DFPC Sig cords)
Headphones: LCD-2 rev 2, LCD-3 (both with Q-Audio cable and Q-Audio 1/4" to XLR adapter for use with b22 amps.)
USB cable: Acoustic Revive 1.0PL
Interconnects: Wireworld Platinum Eclipse 6 (rca), Nordost Heimdall (XLR)
Music used to evaluate included:
Erich Kunzel & the Cincinnati Pops 'Mancini's Greatest Hits
Joshua Redman Quartet 'Spirit of the Moment, Live at the Village Vanguard'
Fred Hersch Trio 'The Fred Hersch Trio Plays'
Wynton Marsalis Septet 'Live at the Village Vanguard'
Buddy Guy 'A Tribute to Stevie Ray Vaughan'
Lyle Lovett 'Joshua Judges Ruth'
Harry Belafonte 'Belafonte Returns to Carnegie Hall'
Frank Sinatra 'Sings for only the Lonely'
Carmen McRae 'The Great American Songbook, Live at Donte's'
John Hammond 'Rough & Tough' (24/96khz)
Richard Thompson 'Folk, Live from Mountain Stage' (24/96khz)
Rani Arbo 'Cocktail Swing' (24/96khz)
Brooks Williams 'Hundred Year Old Shadow' (24/96khz)
Trondheim Solistene 'Divertimenti' (24/192khz)
All music in uncompressed WAV format.