Jump to content

meeskees

Returning Member
  • Posts

    52
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Converted

  • Location
    Haarlem, The Netherlands

Recent Profile Visitors

679 profile views

meeskees's Achievements

Limited Edition Bronze Participant

Limited Edition Bronze Participant (4/6)

1

Reputation

  1. That's what I remember too,but I had the feeling the RCA's are more involving and the bass was a bit tighter.
  2. That would be interesting. I have compared GE and RCA ones. It wasn't easy because it takes quite some time to change the tubes and set the offset and balance again. I thought the RCA's were the better ones, but I am not really sure about that.Good luck!
  3. It is the Korean version.You have to look at the self price quote. Look also at the kakaku site for prices.
  4. http://www.pricejapan.com/k_front/k_good_info.php?code=536&category=10
  5. That makes it very tricky to order a SR-007.
  6. That's interesting, but how do we know what the latest version is?
  7. On the site of Innerfidelity I came across this information of the SR-007. If this information is correct than it means Spritzer has a "Mk2.5". SR-007 Mk1 early version - different driver frame plus some minor material changes, older style carbon fiber box. SR-007 Mk1 late version - the version tested here and the most common of the Mk1's, S/N either 7xxxx or SZ1-xxxx SR-007A/SR-007Mk2 - S/N SZ2-xxxx, Stax change the earpads, how they sit and introduce a port to the earcups. Sound is a mixed bag depending on fit but can be fixed to sound pretty much like the Mk1. SR-007A/SR-007Mk2 - S/N SZ3-xxxx, often called the Mk2.5, Stax supposedly change the diaphragm which results in a much more forward sound signature.
  8. http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/analog-line-level/266052-passive-balanced-attenuator-between-pre-power.html
  9. The drawing is from DIY. There was a discussion which circuit is better.(B they say).I used the online calculator in the link.
  10. After work I have done some soldering. This site gives lot of information http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-voltagedivider.htm. I made an attenuator with resistors I had by hand.I used circuit B .With two 10k seriesrisistors and 5.6 parallel. The attenuation should be 11.5dB. I think it can even a bit more. 12.00 o'clock is now OK with classical music, but much too loud with modern pop music.Older pop music is not so loud.
  11. Thanks Laowei,now I understand what Kevin meant with the Neutrik connector. The problem is I don't have enough space behind my amp.I already use angled connectors. Besides I think it is a bit overkill.I only need 6 resistors to attenuate the signal. I have done some new calculations: line input 10k, attenuation 10dB, R1 & R2 2700 ohms, R3 3300 ohms.
  12. Don't know how to do this with the Gungnir . I am not sure about the calculations. With the 10k series risistors I calculated for -10dB 9.25k for the parallel resistor. Are these a reasonable values?
  13. Thanks Laowei, I will give it a try, but first I have to study it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.