Shawn Posted Saturday at 01:02 PM Report Posted Saturday at 01:02 PM Quick update: it’s 6 AM here in California and I just wrapped up some late-night tweaking. Someone PM’d me earlier asking how I solved the offset and balance issue, and I can finally say: done. Offset is now around 0.3V and balance is about 0.2V. If anyone else is running into similar issues, here’s what worked for me: 1.CCS Set Resistor: I kept the CCS set resistor at 1.5k, which gives around 22–23mA static current. You can try lowering to 1k if you want around 25mA, but I found 1.5k sufficient. The more plate current you have, the higher the offset you will get. 2.Cathode Resistor: Changed from 3300Ω to 7k–7.5k. A larger cathode resistor gives you a deeper grid voltage. I could only find suitable 7k wirewound resistors on Mouser – they’re a bit bulky but still fit. Note: Larger values will increase the offset, so some trial and error is expected. 3. Grid Pot: I replaced the 10k pot with a 50k, which gave me a much wider range to trim both offset and balance. Final bias: around 24–25mA static current, Vgk ≈ -75V. Hopefully, this helps anyone else dialing in the Megatron XL and happy tweaking!😊 1 1 Quote
JoaMat Posted Sunday at 09:33 AM Report Posted Sunday at 09:33 AM (edited) Glad you find a way to adjust the offset. With EL34 as CCS, +400V and offset close to zero, I believe 1.5K gives ~23mA and 1.0K gives ~34mA. Edited Sunday at 09:37 AM by JoaMat Quote
Shawn Posted Sunday at 10:33 PM Report Posted Sunday at 10:33 PM 12 hours ago, JoaMat said: With EL34 as CCS, +400V and offset close to zero, I believe 1.5K gives ~23mA and 1.0K gives ~34mA. Thanks for the correction. I actually paralleled a 3.3k resistor with the existing 1.5k CCS set resistor, which gives an effective resistance of around 1031Ω. Based on the measured voltage drop, that gives me roughly 24–25mA of current. I believe the difference might come from my cathode resistor and grid voltage setup — possibly the cathode current is already limited before reaching the CCS. That might be why the current didn’t rise as much as expected even with the lower set resistor. Quote
JoaMat Posted Sunday at 11:48 PM Report Posted Sunday at 11:48 PM After paralleling with a 3.3K resistor an increase of a few mA seems reasonable, but what happened to the offset? Quote
Shawn Posted 22 hours ago Report Posted 22 hours ago 8 hours ago, JoaMat said: After paralleling with a 3.3K resistor an increase of a few mA seems reasonable, but what happened to the offset? Paralleling a 3.3k resistor with the original 1.5k gave an effective resistance close to 1k, which I expected to behave similarly to using a single 1k resistor. After doing that, the offset increased significantly from around +12V to about +60V. So in the end, I reverted back to the original 1.5k setting resistor. Quote
JoaMat Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago Thanks @Shawn. I have ”gathered” some info from three sets of 300B, one 2A3 and one 6A3. To me it seems that they behave quite similar and need about 7K – 7.5K cathode resistors. Your 50K trimmer (Grid Pot) will probably make it easier with the “fine tuning”. I guess you have put trimmers on the tube side of the board for easier access. Quote
Shawn Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 16 hours ago, JoaMat said: Your 50K trimmer (Grid Pot) will probably make it easier with the “fine tuning”. I guess you have put trimmers on the tube side of the board for easier access. I actually kept the trimmers on the back side of the board. The PCB is mounted upside down near the top of the chassis, and I didn’t drill dedicated holes in the top cover for adjusting the trimmers. So each time I need to fine-tune them, I just tilt the whole chassis on its side and yes a bit inconvenient, but still manageable. A better solution would definitely be to make access holes in the top panel. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.