Jump to content

How good can a Woo 3 or Earmax get?


hungrych

Recommended Posts

Has anyone here heard a Woo 3 with top of the line super duper exotic tubes? I'm just wondering how it would compare to something like a singlepower. It would be alot more convinient for me because of the size, but I don't want to lose out on SQ.

By the same token, how about an Earmax?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest sacd lover

Has anyone here heard a Woo 3 with top of the line super duper exotic tubes? I'm just wondering how it would compare to something like a singlepower. It would be alot more convinient for me because of the size, but I don't want to lose out on SQ.

By the same token, how about an Earmax?

I owned the Woo 3 and I have had two Ear+'s .... one stock and one heavily modded .... each for one month plus auditions. The SLAM ppx3 is still a better sounding amp than either .... IMO. The Woo 3 isnt close. The sound is both to cloudy and somewhat bright. I didnt spend a fortune on nos 6922's but I had several good ones and despite tuberolling the Woo just doesnt scale much. Furthermore, the amp had a low level hum I could not eradicate. The Woo 3 was a BIG dissapointment for me.

The Ear+ is definitely preferable to the Woo. The Ear+ vs the SLAM ppx3 is a somewhat closer comparison but even the modded one doesnt have the liquidity, musicality or refinement of the SLAM. The Ear+ does best with low impedence phones in my system but the SLAM still sounds a little better with grado and especially the Sony's. With my high impedence senn 580/595/600 or AKG 240M .... the SLAM is definitely better.

I dont think people have come to terms with just how good the PPX3 can be with the right tubes = 6sn7 or 7n7 driving 5687's or the 6bl7gt/6bx7gt at 400 volts. At the last Cinci meet I liked Todd's high voltage/ plitron equipped PPX3 the best of any amp at the meet .... and that includes the Zana .... and the Zana is one of the best amps available. You might want to break down and get some adapters for you old chassis mpx3 and use the 5687's; much cheaper than a new amp. Plus that will be like getting a completely new and better amp. I was listening to the SLAM ppx3 last night with a new output tube I am trying out and the amp just puts me in a trance .... SP's are good stuff :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about a millett hybrid?

Think of it as the META42 or PiMeta of hybrid tube amps and you're not too far off. As an inexpensive easy to build amp it sounds pretty nice, but it's not going to challenge the big boys. I built one last month before stripping it for parts for my in progress 12W6 amp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest sacd lover

i would really like to hear an Ear+

I think the ear+ would be so much better if he ditched the 12ax7/5751 and went with an octal gain tube. I tried to get Lloyd to build me one with a 12sn7gt for gain and he wouldnt do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest sacd lover

weird. i guess he just isn't in to that kind of custimization, not that it would take that much to change to a 12sn7.

Thats what I thought. Maybe because the chassis would need a larger cutout .... but again that should not have been a big deal. Oh well I just bought another Singlepower. O0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats what I thought. Maybe because the chassis would need a larger cutout .... but again that should not have been a big deal. Oh well I just bought another Singlepower. O0

Another idea would be to change a few resistors & wires around and plop in a 5687, wouldn't have to do a single chassis mod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Odd that the question was on the Earmax, but no replies on this amp? Is the EM/EMP rare in headphiler's inventories?

I recently bought a near-mint EMP used with Philips E188CC NOS and good testing TFK ECC801S (yes, those) tubes. The trio is considered by many--but not by me in my circuit--as the best available. After some rolling of the outer tubes to Amperex ECC88 (6922) Holand OG and USA WS (both shield-halo construction, both 1960s) and rolling dozens of 12AT7s to select the handful of finest sounding ever made (have tested almost all and I do not rank the TFK abong the best)--and a bit of cable rolling, I find the Earmax Pro (EMP) absolutely charming with Senn HD650/Cardas. Transparent and musical with great bass, though with intense bass (rare even for this RAP/RnB listener) is can get flustered. For Jazz and vocals, it's spectacular.

I also own the SP PPX3-6CG7 (P2P with upgrades) running with a NOS GE 6GU7 and a pair of NOS RCA Blackplates. The SP is super (but not SUPRA) as well. Both the EMP and PPx3-6CG7 are around the same price used. After several weeks of listening to both; frankly, I cannot decide--but--if pressed to take only one to an island and live with it forever, I might choose the EMP.

Both amps are quite responsive to tube rolling; however, great 6CG7s are cheap--great 6DJ8s are expensive (but great 12AT7s may be had relatively cheaply as well). A full tube rolling experience with 6CG7/6GU7 will cost about $100 on ebay for the PPX3, a full roll with the EMP could go over $500 (exclusing pinched waist and CCa breeds).

The SP has the upper hand in power and impact, the EMP wins tone and musicality--and--I do not find it 'tubey' at all, nor underpowered with the Senns. They are both roughly equal with most bass.

If, however, you prefer low impedence phones, you should definately lean to the SP line, without question. The stock tubes that come with both are mediocre and mask the potential of these fine amps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.