Everything posted by boodi
-
5 minute edit window too short...
there's a poll on top of the thread
-
Gilmore Reference indahouse , first impressions ( pics coming )
pict it's plain beautiful (much better from real , it shows a very clean job )
-
Gilmore Reference indahouse , first impressions ( pics coming )
how much would it be upgrading to balanced.. For what i see , it misses only two modules and connectors btw I seeing the gs-x inside pics it seem very similar ( if not the same ) of the reference balanced , with the addendum of separate power and gain switch..
-
Gilmore Reference indahouse , first impressions ( pics coming )
thanks btw the short edit time is quite an issue in this forum for me at least delete "balanced" anywhere you find it
-
5 minute edit window too short...
for me is definitely too short , I would leave it open for about 24hrs. ( personal ) .. but even going 10/30 minutes would help me a bit when correcting my posts
-
Gilmore Reference indahouse , first impressions ( pics coming )
now if you say that the balanced is a "fine" amp you really shock me .. the balanced better this sound.. I mean it's not the first nice amp I've got.. frankly I can't imagine a large improvement over this amp behavior .. apart of the mids thing I've yet noted ( not that mids aren't good, they are but maybe suffer a lill topping of roundness and sexyness , mainly for voices ) maybe it's not even worth to get it balanced for the cans I'll prevalently use it with .. (:sending a omg mail to the seller:)
-
Gilmore Reference indahouse , first impressions ( pics coming )
it's not balanced .. it's reference but not balanced indid ... wrong title wrong thread wrong my ass posting balanced.. ( :run away to contact the seller:)
-
Gilmore Reference indahouse , first impressions ( pics coming )
I know , the balanced reference has only rca-in ooh I have to upgrade..I hoped I could have lived happy for a while .. returning to serious world, this amp (rca wise headbabies) kick some big and serious ass down to first floor
-
Gilmore Reference indahouse , first impressions ( pics coming )
it's incredible the virtues of this amp are putting my head to rest , and ears to pacifically drool over it. this amp is easily the best amp I've come across , it's absolutely linear smooth outraugeoulsy extended at both ends , it gives the most effortless presentation , while keeping the bass solidly firm and never an inch out of the picture . It's solid state , but other then this it's difficult to tell it has transistor related character , which is a very good thing . It does a very nice job with ps-1 finally . Bass and bass to mids frq.s region are both very smooth and very well rendered ; there's a great sense of deepness , coherence and authoritative control , and these are melt very well togheter in the sound too . The main problem for ps-1 should be now source match - so imaging the situation I've opted to get my system a Meridian over a Wadia , that was former first love . It does a perfect job for hp-2 , they're singing out every last bit of their virtues , these cans never chase to amaze me . Fact with hp-2 was , even if building up a thick dry and solid -not overpowered- bass, they miss the lill low region vibe that sometimes makes music more a joy :looking to ps-1: . I would ( and will ) strongly advice any hp-2 owner look at HeadAmp top of the line products for amping the hp-2 . It do a great job on all the frq. spectrum , and moreover synergise on this aspect that's peculiar hp-2 . It lacks the final bit of mids roundness for them though , so I see where's a melos could say " I'm better" in front of it. It's definitely sold state , but that's the best of the best of the best solid state I could imagine to plug my cans in <- insert cans orgasm here . disclaimer Gs-X owners can't partecipate the thread don't have much time to take pics at the moment , but will do as soon as the G07 lands and pairs it
-
The Apollo has landed.
Thanks for the report .. quite skeptic on your findings though . wasn't it unburned maybe ?
-
Redwine Audio iMods
imso Vinnie has just gone thourgh anything possible andit's likely the mod the 4g it's the best option
-
Redwine Audio iMods
What i hear is bit of congestion / undefinition in mids & upper&mid bass , and a typical mids to highs harshness that's usually related to the fact electronic is un-burned. I'm confident things will change in 200hr. Thing is I don't see how this player can go compete with any of my home units , as it is clearly not in the same tier .
-
Redwine Audio iMods
I want to tell also that the sound I'm hearing is quite far from the astonishing good raves I've read around about
-
Redwine Audio iMods
just received my i-mod yesterday and got it running now.. what to say .. at the moment even the panasonic ct-470 player sounds better and cleaner . there's a very nice ( high ) amount of digital glare and harshness on highs , that's probably time to let it burn
-
K181: Get'em, not get'em, what should I do?
I'm interested as well in them as even if they looks extraordinary similar to hd-25 in function , they suggest (lookwise) a more impactful bass and more mellow mids . ah
-
Redwine Audio iMods
hu do you have something to do with Vincent Gramain ?
-
What rocks?
to rock , or not to rock ..
-
Tyll , do you think the total bithead 2006 ..
disarming humility are you in a rush for "most honoruable and honest vendor of the year" or what ? jk , thanks for answring
-
Tyll , do you think the total bithead 2006 ..
yeah I wasn't sarcastic or ironic , I read jude and old pa' ( in fact I was asking really how can it be ) probably is a combination , better parts united to even slightly better designs or better design approach can really measure even more then substantial improvements on small integrated peripherals my guess
-
Tyll , do you think the total bithead 2006 ..
I find it quite frustrating too I hope for a new governor ( less taxes , more rights , blabla and top of this , longer edit time please )
- What rocks?
- What rocks?
- What rocks?
-
Tyll , do you think the total bithead 2006 ..
if I can ask how can it be anytime there's a new version the changes are so substantial ? I mean, it's always ( and remains ) a tiny designed very low price higly integrated amp.. ( that's appealing! ) .. anyhow what's substantially change inside ? that can sort out such good new result , that is a significantly better signal behavior - out of a such tiny package - ? thanks for outing this
-
Tyll , do you think the total bithead 2006 ..
do you like it much more over his predecessor ( sq wise ) ?