Jump to content

Wmcmanus

High Rollers
  • Posts

    3,503
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Everything posted by Wmcmanus

  1. Indeed, I sit corrected. I've updated my knowledge in this matter by reference to the Urban dictionary, which offers some rather entertaining entries from John Q. Public's very best.
  2. Leftover Santa candy.
  3. I thought only women had taint.
  4. It would look good with sweat socks.
  5. Serious or sarcastic comment?
  6. The thread title actually should have read "...when selling goods and receiving funds via PayPal" because having the sender of funds select "gift" rather than "goods" is what saves the recipient the 2.9% fee; it's also what is now causing certain transactions to be red flagged. Seems to me that the best way to avoid getting caught up in this situation (short of playing by the rules and absorbing the 2.9% fees), is to: 1) avoid putting anything in the comment box, such as a shipping address or reference to the item sold, that would make it look like a "goods" transaction, 2) have the buyer send a nice round number, such as $100, rather than $103.58 or $96.75 (which don't look like typical gift amounts) and then agree to square up on the difference by some other means. 3) try to minimize the number of gift transactions that are being sent to you by any one person or at any one point in time.
  7. This was news to me. Why not to accept "gifts" on paypal when selling items on paypal - Head-Fi: Covering Headphones, Earphones and Portable Audio Note that all it took to have the transaction flagged was the inclusion of an address in the comments section. I'm not surprised that they're cracking down on this, given that they don't collect fees on gifts.
  8. Hey, now there's an idea! I'd invest in group snatch! I've been dreaming of the opportunity for about 30 years now.
  9. I like that, especially the .25 part.
  10. I'm not sure what the answer to that is. The stuff will be seized as evidence initially in support of the criminal actions against her, which will obviously be quite easy to prove but will still take time. I'd imagine there will be a civil suit filed by Koss against her as well which should eventually allow them to recoup most of the assets found in her possession at the time of her arrest, since she obviously won't have $20 million in cash to pay a judgement. I'd imagine she'll go to jail and will also declare personal bankruptcy to protect whatever she can (house and such).
  11. I know the Monkey man was just joking when he said this, but $20 million was just under half of the company's market capitalization at the time the stock was halted shortly after the news broke. KOSS stock quote - Koss Corporation stock price - NASDAQ.com No telling what the market will have to say when trading resumes, especially given how thinly traded a small cap company like Koss normally is. Presumably trading will resume after the SEC's fact finding mission is over and public disclosures are made as to exactly what we're dealing with here. That may take quite some time, given that they issued a non reliance 8k (for financials dating back to June 30, 2006) right away, and they may well uncover evidence that the fraud predates that time period. Fun times for forensic auditors in Milwaukee these days. Summary of KOSS CORP - Yahoo! Finance The following news article is dated but includes details that I hadn't seen last time I did a search. Koss now says embezzlement could exceed earnings during same period For example, the Koss family holds 73% of the stock in the company. Ouch! I'd also missed the fact that Michael Koss is President, CEO and CFO. Not a good idea to combine the CEO and CFO roles, even (as in this case), if it's only for "official" reporting purposes. In reality, she was for all intents and purposes acting as the CFO, so it probably wouldn't have made a difference if she was the person who was signing off as the CFO. But at least the formality of designating her as CFO would have put her through the paces of one more round of questionnaires and interviews with the auditors each year. But sheez!, Grant Thornton wasn't even assessing the company's effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting! In a way, I can understand this, especially for small publicly traded companies that have been increasingly bombarded by the cost, time, and hassle of dealing with more and more regulation and reporting requirements. Then you get in good with your auditors and lawyers and convince them to cut any corners they possibly can to keep your costs down... Also, I just love that last paragraph of the article! It pretty much confirms my suspicions that she was preparing to set up her own boutique at some point in time. Imagine a start up boutique with $2 million of inventory from day one? I'd imagine she could have done quite well in her little retirement job!
  12. Oh ya, that too. I about crapped when I saw it on Amazon for $10.49, but I guess it's kind of old news these days (I mean, the performance itself). Funny though. I've got it on CD and DVD and at one time probably had it on vinyl as well. It's never looked or sounded so good (per the reviews, although I don't have my copy yet), and it's never been nearly so cheap.
  13. Exactly! How did you know?
  14. Most of the Gov't Mule back catalog.
  15. Yes, specific specifications are a good thing but they must be kept top secret.
  16. This year I resolve to quit writing 1974 on my checks. If I can get through the first couple of weeks of January, I should be alright.
  17. Reports at Head-Fi suggest around 200 hours or so, but I never know what to make of such things. Seems like that's sort of the magic number (more or less) most commonly suggested for pretty much any headphones. Best advice is to just let 'em burn in at slightly above normal listening levels and check in on them frequently. I've been thinking about picking up a pair myself, but haven't pulled the trigger yet. Thinking about some Canon L glass as well, which would probably get more use.
  18. What? A Florida meet not organized by Mike? I'll bet it sucks! Ya, should be fun. I'll try to make it but don't know if I'll be able to manage it in terms of the timing.
  19. Interesting, indeed. But I suppose, eating it every day, with no hot butter... prepared prison style (probably just boiled), ya sure, that would get boring.
  20. Happy birthday, Jacob. Hope to see you in Chicago this summer.
  21. Don't ask me why, but I saw this T-shirt today and it reminded me of this thread: FUNNY T-SHIRT: PIE TASTES LIKE PUSSY
  22. I voted 2000-5000 but am on the lower side of that range. About 2400 CDs/SACDs, 300 albums and 300 DVD/BluRay. To this day, I have no idea what ever happened to the 1000+ albums that I collected in high school and college. They went into storage but never came out. I always thought my brother was behind it, but he swears he wasn't.
  23. Ya, lucky you, living in your "building" and not having to cut the grass. That's what I need to do today, with my JH13 and iPod rig. Thankfully, I have a rider so I don't have to actually exercise. That would really be torture!
  24. With the HD800, my experience so far has been akin to what it feels like to find that "perfect" girlfriend, at least initially. Yet, you instinctively know that she can't be that perfect, thus you're better off finding out what her hangups are sooner rather than later, which then softens the blow of the inevitable letdown. This is why I'm curious to learn more from those who aren't so taken by the HD800s in terms of what is missing and why. Sorry if in the midst of that I added my own interpretation to your post and got it all wrong. Anyway, neutral headphones are good in my book as well. Much easier to live with in the long run because they're not as likely to become distracting and get in the way of the music. That's the way I'd go if I were trying to narrow down to just one or two pairs of headphones as keepers.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.