Knuckledragger

Today participating Rat Shacks are selling 4 packs of their premium "digital" AA an AAA batteries for $1 each. If you have a Rat Shack credit card, you get an additional 15% off.

Chicago area Head-Casers, here's your chance to buy Cameron's house from Ferris Bueller's Day Off: [url=http://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-detail/370-Beech-Street_Highland-Park_IL_60035_1109385563]370 Beech Street, Highland Park, IL, 60035 - MLS ID#07218797 - Single Family Home real estate - REALTOR.com

Has this been posted yet?

I third the 880 suggestion.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCfsCQybek0

I should point out at this juncture that I went to high school with Steve Porter. He was so normal back then.

McIntosh should stick to tube amps and pres.

myfoxatlanta.com | Top 50 Text Acronyms Parents Should Know 052009 Highlights include: NIFOC: Nude In Front Of The Computer DUSL: Do You Scream Loud? IMEZRU: I Am Easy, Are You? FMLTWIA: Fuck Me Like The Whore That I Am

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfqL7bwx9fs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCVWFp3if5E

I generally only use the high and very high light smoothing settings in Photomatix. There are rare occasions where I'll use the medium setting. The lower two are garbage. They remind of processing HDR in Photoshop CS2. This image is the result of an elaborate workflow. I combined three images in Photomatix, and genrated an .hdr file. I then opened it with DynamicPhoto HDR (which objected, but loaded it anyway.) I spent quite a bit of time adjusting the tone mapping in DPHDR and saved it as a jpeg. Then I worked it over pretty thoroughly in Photoshop. The end result is kind of bizarre, but not without merit. The effect of using Photomatix for the HDR process instead of DPHDR seems to be a lot less CA, a bit less noise. Likewise, the image was much higher in contrast. I'm not sure if I like that last bit.