Jump to content

Koss ESP-950


Dusty Chalk

Recommended Posts

Once you ditch their amplifier and hook it to something real they sound VERY nice.

Certainly at least he60 nice.

Their amp though... Yikes is it ever bad. Sounds darker than dark.

By the way these headphones with the koss amp play significantly louder

than any other electrostic headphone ever made. Louder in fact than

virtually all dynamics too. 2400 volts peak to peak stator to stator is

almost twice everything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
You might want to consider Peter McAlisters new EA-4 amplifier for ~$1k.
Possibly, but not likely. After having heard Justin's KGSS and Blue Hawaii, I'm kind of spoiled. I have a Stax amp that will work for now (need to work out some sort of adapter) until I can save up the dosh. But it's not exactly on the top of my list of things to get, so this is quite a ways off.

I agree it shore does look purdy, though. Wonder how it sounds, you heard it? And whether or not it is truly balanced.

It's about the same as the difference between a Senn 580 and Senn 600. ;D
I don't think so. (folds arms and puts on faux-frowny face)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dusty=+$=+SQ

Actually, the equation would likely be +$||+SQ (|| indicates correlation, IIRC). Since the relationship is not perfect, and actually rather difficult to calculate in the absence of a quantitative method of measuring SQ, r (correlation coefficient) < 1.

OTOH, for the relationship +$||+price, I'd expect r=1. Normally, expensive gear does cost more >:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bang for the buck
AAAAAAHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!

It's BANG FOR YOUR BUCK!!!!!!!!!!

Damnit, I fucking hate that. :D

Yeah, sorry if I snapped -- I just resented the implication. I am the last person to be accused of "more expensive == better".
Cool, sorry if I was insulting with my comment. :-[

You might want to contact Peter about his new electrostatic amp design though... he seems pretty confident that it is the 'best EVAR'. 8)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AAAAAAHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!

It's BANG FOR YOUR BUCK!!!!!!!!!!

Damnit, I fucking hate that. :DCool

Hey Phil, If you?re going to attempt to be the Language Police you should at least get your shit straight. There is enough data indicating that what I said is appropriate. I?m not saying your version is inappropriate, but I?m not the person correcting other peoples use of English idioms on a fucking forum.

givemehead.gifsmileandfucku.gif

http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/bang+for+buck Scroll down

http://www.randomhouse.com/wotd/index.pperl?date=19971219

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well... both phrases when placed in quotes return 10 pages on Google, so I think it is safe to say that they're both highly used. My primary problem with "bang for the buck" is it makes you sound like an ESL student while "bang for your buck" seems to be a more correct phrasing.

givemehead.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.