As most of you know, I have been (obsessively) comparing DACs lately. I've been finding that my preference leans toward a DAC with a "sweeter" midrange. No, what the fuck exactly does that mean? I'm, not quite sure, to be honest. So far, I have really liked the Dodson and the ECD-1 because the midrange (esp. voices) seems to stand out just a bit more from the rest of the presentation. It's subtle, but it's there. Like very shallow bas relief where the midrange is raised ever so slightly higher than the rest (and maybe some midbass too).
My perception when hearing the ECD-1 and the Dodson is that they are somehow clearer or revealing more information in those mids than comparators such as the Bryston, North Star, or HR UDAC, which seem to have a more recessed or "muted" presentation.
I have read certain criticisms (and I wish I remembered where) that postulate that the mids of some DACs, such as the ECD-1, are emphasized because that's basically a crowd-pleaser. But that in the end, it's really hiding the DAC's shortcomings. I'm not sure I agree with this, but I have insufficient knowledge to make a conclusion one way or the other.
What I do know is that I prefer those DACs where the mids give me a better sense of "presence." Is this a preference for artifice? Are the newer, more technically "advanced" DACs, with their seemingly more "neutral" presentation closer to what others would describe as analog sounding? Or is this all just a bunch of hooey?