grawk

I wasn't kidding with my bid. I'd pay $2800 for them in today's market. I'd flip them later, of course.

just say no to frivolous class action suits where each plaintiff gets $5 and the lawyers get $20mil

I bid $2800 as the first bidder

The handler, of course

They can only decide for htemselves if there are recordings with the same signal path, but other microphones that others consider good...

participated in a dog and pony show for dept of commerce budget folks

I'm still winning

pimpin' ain't easy

It's sceptre-ier

Great, I guess I misunderstood the load maggies presented.

The Buffalo DAC

I'm high bidder

pictures?

MMGs need an amp that's stable to 2ohms. If you have one, go for it.

Yah, but that means a power amp for the front channel of my home theater, since the marantz isn't 2 ohm stable.

mexican deep fried tostada shells, cracked and used as chips, with home-made rotel salsa

I"m tempted to buy MMG-Ws instead of ESP950s

no word means he was lying.

stax cables

My mouse has 5 buttons and a trackball, on my mac. And my macs all have utorrent

We're definitely different, it's because so many new members come here not to be part of a community but to take from the community without contributing. We find making it hard to get accepted cuts down on that quite a bit.

It's definitely different, whether you like it or not.

I think that's because the flaws in most cds are on the disc in the form of poor recordings, and in the nature of the cd medium, and are being overcome through electronics on good cd players...

I don't believe that dacs intentionally sound worse at lower sample rates, I think the designs just aren't always optimized for all sample rates.

Except I believe that's done on purpose for marketting reasons.