Finished the right channel today. Feedback as suggested by Justin. Bias servo as suggested by Kevin.

Red smoke – Super Symmetrical mode.

Green smoke  –  Zero Feedback mode.

i habe some current mirror amplifier ss/zf version 1.21 here that i like to use for the amp build.

may i ask about two points on the underside of the board (orange marked) look liks place for a jumper on the front siede the are between the two 82ohm resistors. are they for jumper and/or what are they used for. thx

reserved for the SMD MLCC 47uF Caps

I used Thru-hole ones

thank ang728 for the info, then im ready to order parts 🙂

finished my cfa3 this week, thanks kevin gilmore for the desing and the support from the forum members.

running on +-30v with moderat bias, changed the gain resistors to 3.2k for lower gain.

needed some 3d printed parts so that all fit fine, a cfa3 in a quad 405 chase. no pot this time, i use a dac with volume control or a preamp.

after all amps i build i think the best solution for a 1 case build ist mounting the trafos outside in vertical position, absolut no magnetic hum inducted. i also added grain oriented metal band around the trafos inside the trafo cases.

Funny casing, nice to see!

Nice! So the trafo is in this box not in an outer case. Would be nice a picture from the front too.

3 hours ago, judo said:

Nice! So the trafo is in this box not in an outer case. Would be nice a picture from the front too.

The first picture he posted was from the front.
Quad 405 cases have the sink on the front 🙂 

I have built a 405 ages ago then let's see the back🙂

I am working on a CFA3 build where the original THAT340 input devices have been changed to a JFET input pair.

For a rough simulation I used these models:

.model 2SJ103 PJF VTO=-1.5 BETA=10m LAMBDA=0.01 RD=20 RS=20 CGS=50p CGD=45p IS=10p

.model 2SK246 NJF(Beta=2.5m Vto=-1.5 Is=1e-14 Cgd=4p Cgs=5p)

This is only intended as an input-impedance / loading check, not a final device-accurate distortion simulation.

With the current SS input/feedback network:

R24/R26 = 5k

R44/R49 = 50k

C9/C10 = 20p

I get approximately:

SS mode input impedance: ~11.7k ohm per phase at 1 kHz

ZF mode input impedance: ~50k ohm per phase at 1 kHz

So even though the input devices are JFETs, the SS mode input impedance is still relatively low because of the surrounding SS input/feedback network.

The practical concern is that I changed the volume control from 10k to 50k. With a 50k attenuator, the source impedance around mid attenuation can be much higher than with a 10k control. That seems like it can load/interact with the ~11.7k SS-mode input impedance, while ZF mode is much less affected.

I am considering scaling the SS input/feedback network values upward while keeping the same approximate ratio and compensation time constant.

Current:

R24/R26 = 5k

R44/R49 = 50k

C9/C10 = 20p

Conservative option:

R24/R26 = 10k

R44/R49 = 100k

C9/C10 = 10p

Simulation:

SS input impedance rises to ~20.2k per phase

SS gain changes from about 15.0 dB to 14.7 dB

More aggressive option:

R24/R26 = 15k

R44/R49 = 150k

C9/C10 = 6.8p

Simulation:

SS input impedance rises to ~26.6k per phase

SS gain changes to about 14.5 dB

The idea is to reduce the current drawn from the volume control and raise the effective SS-mode input impedance, without changing the low-frequency feedback/input ratio too much.

Has anyone tried this on a JFET-input CFA3, especially with a 50k volume control?

Does scaling R24/R26 and R44/R49 like this seem reasonable, or is there a known preferred value set for JFET-input builds?