RudeWolf

Returning Member
  • Content count

    808
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

RudeWolf last won the day on July 30 2013

RudeWolf had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

118 Excellent

About RudeWolf

  • Rank
    Limited Edition Bronze Participant
  • Birthday 12/17/1987

Contact Methods

  • Yahoo
    r_putnins@yahoo.com
  • Skype
    rude_wolf

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Riga, Latvia
  • Interests
    Ethics, philosophy of science, music, communication, landscape photography.

Converted

  • Location
    Riga, Latvia
  • Interests
    Ethics, philosophy of science, music, communication, landscape photography.
  • Occupation
    Marketing manager
  • Hobbies
    Photography, mountain biking, deliberate music listening.
  • Headphones
    LFF Paradox, LCD-2.5, Earsonics SM3v2.
  • Headphone Amps
    QRV-08
  • Sources
    Parasound D/AC-1600 modded (to death), Stello DA-100 Signature
  • Other Audio Gear
    Sony TA-F730ES and KEF LS50

Recent Profile Visitors

1,967 profile views
  1. Here's how the Staxen I had measured. Lambda Pro Lambda Nova Classic For reference - HD800 Overall the Pro sounded more anemic and I preferred the LNC. The earlier roll-off is clearly audible.
  2. Ain't mine! One of the luxuries of my work is that I get to try out many headphones that pass through us (no, I don't work at the post!). The amp has been modified, judging by the fact that RCA's are not stock and there's only one pair of them. Maybe even one of yours, eh? Luckily I'm knee deep in another audio project, so there are no free funds. Otherwise I'd be looking for a PCB set and maybe a pair electrostats.
  3. Finally got my stat cherry properly popped. Previously listened to a SR-202 from that small Stax amp and it didn't do much for me. Lambda Nova from SRM-1/MK2 sounds really good and bass is actually there.
  4. Okay, there is something to those electrostats. Didn't get it with the SR-202's, but Novas from SRM-1/2 float my boat. u9T841e.jpg

  5. OPA1688, OPA1612 and OPA1622 if I'm not mistaken. I think it's the first commercial device to use the OPA1688. Usually one uses opamp and a high current buffer to isolate the opamp from the load and get it to dominate small signal performance. The usual suspects back in the day were OPA134+BUF634 sharing the same feedback loop. In this case RME opted for three OPA1688 per channel to distribute the load, or six for balanced. I personally don't subscribe to the Burson-esque notion that all IC's are bad. In my experience opamps excel in small signal environments with fixed or at least predictable operating conditions. Here RME proved me wrong with their headamp. Interestingly enough the headphone output shares the same distortion characteristics as the line outputs and can be used as such in a pinch (if one needs 4 analog channel output).
  6. Our head of RnD uses a Fireface UC and we've relied on a Babyface to not leave us with our pants down when we tour high profile LA studios. Rock solid drivers and well thought out controls. Sadly. they'll never outsell stuff like Behringer or Focusrite because it's hard to sell reliability to people who have never been burnt. Sure is. But it's hard for me to just call it a DAC. The thing comes with a 80 page manual to cover all of the features and functions. You have ADC with actual 124dbA SNR, you can use it just as an analog input, but it wouldn't be out of place in a world class mastering studio. It has two headamps which can be configured to play different tracks, if your playback software allows it. Or you can just tell the unit to take each of the DAC outputs and utilize each headamp for differential drive. Oh, and it'll detect automatically if you're using SE or BAL...
  7. Output spectrum is actually something I would expect to see from such ladders. With that said - most of the harmonics are -100dB below the signal, so it's okay in my book. I mean - I've heard better measuring DACs which have sounded far worse. Stock Buffalo 3 for example. Btw, this might interest the mafia members in possession of DIY Soekris modules.
  8. Looks like it's the age of no-chip. I was very impressed by the sound of first edition Soekris boards. It took two extra revisions of the board and around a year of firmware updates to get there, but now it's pretty stellar. I'd love to hear what DAC1541 has to offer. I'd also say that some of the higher end implementations of Asahi Kasei chips sound really nice. I went from DAM1021 to RME ADI-2 Pro and don't feel like I'm missing anything sound wise.
  9. Picked one up mostly due to an interesting feature set. I've had good experience with RME gear being technically impeccable, but falling a bit short in listening tests. The ADI-2 Pro was intended to be an office rig, but I lug it to and fro work, it's that good. Ended up buying one of the limited Anniversary Editions, cuz it's black and has moar pretty. It runs my HD800 balanced with 6x OPA1688 chips pre channel. Sounds as good or better as I've heard any HD800 perform. It also does 5 band PEQ which makes HD800's actually listenable. For my Equator Q12 I use the back XLR's and intend to hook up a MiniDSP via optical to integrate two custom 15" subs. Anyho - check this thing out, if you're looking for an interesting source unit. Cheerio. P.S. Nudie (almost Gilmore sized)
  10. Top this.
  11. Well, there's always RME Babyface Pro. I'd pay top dollar for that, if I'd need one. My company uses the old Babyface and it's pretty darn good.
  12. I wouldn't like to pay more than 200 for a USB powered DAC. The downfall of these devices usually is dependability on USB power, therefore performance will vary depending on USB quality.
  13. Well, I work at an audio company and often I too get approached by people wanting to review our stuff. Usually I do some background checks so I can estimate the impact of a review, but seeing "Not to brag too much but I think I have a gifted writing style and able to transmit what I hear into a well written review" would tick me off instantly. Dude has like 5 reviews at HF and only one is what I'd consider popular.
  14. Since when has this been an obstacle to producing good audio literature?