n_maher
-
Posts
27,336 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
286
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by n_maher
-
-
There, you got the last word, twice.you still sound pissy. i believe you are pissy. in fact, you have been pissy elsewhere today too. the shit you are selling is pretty much straight bs... slapping a label on me, saying i called you gay (which I did not), saying whatever point someone make i always spew back, and most of all not backing it up. what a baby, i twist one sentence and you are having a little hissy. what you don't realize is what i repeated back is applicable to you, though, you obviously don't like to hear that. i assume you aren't an idiot and know what the word "ambiguously" means? by reacting as you did demonstrates your own insecurities. you sure seemed to care about it. keeping telling yourself that... anyone can have gay friends, but that doesn't etablish shit. i am not worry at all, in fact, this is all extremely amusing.
-
Postjack having a bad day would never happen on postjack's forum.
-
I'm not pissy in the slightest and I'm not sure what "shit" it is that I'm selling. Otherwise I'm done, I'm not going to try and argue with you further since your entire tactic consists of taking whatever point someone is trying to make against you and then saying the exact same thing (see above quoted post). So there you go, have the last word if you'd like.no you called me... (keep it straight now) as bad a messup as he (billy) is (or something near exact to that)... i didn't call you gay, but the horror if it did.
it is funny, though, because you obviously are more pissy over something i didn't even say. in fact, you were the first to use the gay word in this thread. what do you have against gay people? you're not homophobic, are you? just keep repeating more of your own bs, beguiled by a pic that meant to imply a fantastic duo that isn't doing anything gaylike unless you think two guys shaking hands is gay. perhaps you took my "pic" the wrong way and a bit too seriously due to a previous sensitivity about an issue. double standards are so telling about ones credibility. you continue to sell shit without backing it or just make shit up. absolutely precious.For the record, the picture you posted is the "Ambiguously Gay Duo", but I don't really care about that. I'm secure enough in my manhood and have enough friends of all persuasions to not have to worry.
-
I called you a messup, the horror of such a thing. You the proceeded to called me gay, unless you don't know who the folks are in the picture you used and also questioned my credibility in general. I'd say I was being a bit more jovial about the situation, wouldn't you? Perhaps you took my "messup" comment a bit too seriously due to a previous sensitivity about an issue.your opinion about my opinions are off base <snip>
-
Nice one Todd.Sorry about your thin skin postjack
-
What else should I say? My opinion of you, based on observed behavior (that you clearly don't agree with) is that generally when you start an argument you have no point. So why would I continue to argue with you? You've already called me gay, so we're clearly past the point of reason, and consequently why would I think anything meaningful as far as debate is concerned would come about after that?what else would you say
-
Maybe I'm not understanding the nature of the pad reversal, how were they "reversed"? L to R? Front to Back? They look pretty symmetrical to me so it just isn't clear how that would make a difference.
-
Yes, I'm sure.are you sure you aren't talking about yourself (right here, right now, in this thread based on this course of discussion.
-
I'm not shouting.Why there has to be this shouting match between us nate I don't get.
I do not discriminate who I will or will not help on the basis of whether or not I agree with how they conduct themselves. Help is to be given, not withheld. Nor do I conduct myself much differently at HF, the reality is that it is simply not acceptable to speak openly there so I choose not to stir up poop for the sake of stirring it up. When given the opportunity I will always respond honestly.If anyone is a hypocrite it is you. You are polite, respectful, hell even helpful when posting to my threads in the other world. If you friends were allowed to read what you say there vs here maybe you wouldn't be in the "cool" club!
Nope, I'm a normal well adjusted guy. And I don't really bash Ray, I'm pretty objectively critical of a lot of the manufacturers. I can understand that you haven't read much around here to know that but that's the truth of it.Bashing RSA etc here to be in the "cool" club is sad. Were you picked on as a kid or something? -
no not really it's pretty much the same, but you are full of unfounded assumptions... not an original thought, throws a label out, not related, but as others it's unsupported.
Wake me when you stand behind an opinion, even one that isn't yours.
That VU meter in your sig always reminded me of how I think you change your opinion back and forth, back and forth. It's a most appropriate graphical representation of you.
-
It's one of the big reasons to avoid LCD HDTV's. Most manufacturers accept that there may be multiple bad pixels in a given display and will not warranty them as defective. At least my Sony, which uses three small LCDs simultaneously is more forgiving since if one color goes bad it'll be masked by the other two.Yeezh.
-
As far as I understand it the problem is the transistors. And the real problem is that they can't test for bad pixels until the display is complete and at that point the only option is to approve it for use or toss it completely. If they rejected every display that had a bad pixel (hot, dead, colored, whatever) prices would be significantly higher.Are you serious? That sucks. With the amount of money spent on those things, you'd think they'd be able to get it right. Isn't it just a memory location in the controller? Or is it the LCD itself?
-
Oh NOS, 909's opinion of me is worse. Of course, given your history of rampant flip-flopping all I have to do is wait 2 minutes and you'll change your mind.you just lost any bit of credibility you might have once believed you might have had.
-
Just a guess but too much gain, maybe? I'm guessing your K340 specific amp isn't exactly lacking in the gain department.Why would the headphone output be a bad place to have the preamp outs?
-
Yeah, but you're as bad a messup as he is so we didn't pay attention to your diagnosis.hey i started talking about billy's subconscious state on the previous page.
-
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, Todd, it's a flipping duck.
Whether or not you feel comfortable admitting it time after time you've bought a product, started one of your now patented ALL CAPS THREADZ W/ PICS!!!!, only to sell the very item in question a short period of time later. Now, if you want, you can make fun of me all day long for continuously cycling gear through my rig but the only product I've ever shamelessly self-promoted was the Wheatfield, because no one knew what the hell it was.
-
Are you kidding me?Nice outfit for the dog.
??? Nice work Jay.
-
Especially if you're willing to shill the shit out of them, build up community interest and then dump them. I swear, Todd, you must walk backwards half the time you're such a hypocrite. I seem to recall a certain PM that you sent me saying you weren't gushing all of the V-dock just to sell it. But wait, a month later you did?RSA ALO products are great and have tremendous re-sale value!
-
SUPER SECRET SPY PHOTO
-
Yup, you don't want to know how expensive those panels would be if they were required to have 100% perfect pixels. Sorry to hear that you've got a stuck one.No, having one stuck pixel doesn't fall under warrenty. No manufacturers consider that to be a failure. I can't remember the exact amount but it takes a lot of stuck or dead pixels for a manufacturer to replace your screen.
-
Yeah, I've been talking quite a bit with the Belgians about custom machining.Ah, not for yours, got it.
-
Might also be helpful to provide some background information like where and how you'll be using the headphones.
-
What size? For a 4-ch beta?
Decided to cheap out, eh?
It's for a one-box 2-channel beta I'm building for someone around these parts.
MOTMOTMOTMOTMOTMOTMOTMOTMOTMOTMOTMOT
I don't think Par really qualifies as cheaping out as long as you use what they provide wisely. My first beta looked pretty decent and that was a Par chassis.
But no, my beta won't be finding its way into a PM chassis, that's almost guaranteed. -
Par Metals chassis for a little beta22 I'm building.
Trains, Fireworks, and a Harley-Davidson
in Miscellaneous
Posted