Jump to content

The Headcase Stax thread


thrice

Recommended Posts

Already been posted, not sure if you're being serious or sarcastic.

 

But both Spritzer and Kevin have done this (with better quality transformers) in the past and both have posted there lengthy discussions why it's never going to be an optimal solution compared to a proper discrete and dedicated e-stat amplifier.

 

Seem's that Eric is shilling the crap out of the RKV stuff and now this energizer on head-fi and Kevin has posted his technical counter-arguments why that energizer is an overpriced piece of crap that does the same thing a $150 SRD-7 energizer does Stax made over 20 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a good article on the awesomeness of the Verto:

 

http://hifipig.com/audiovalve-verto-and-rkv-mk-3-headphone-amplifiers/

 

So it basically doesn't work and I can't say I'm surprised.  I've seen a lot of takes on the self bias idea over the years but this one is by far the worst.  As one would imagine, to get +580V bias off the music signal would require some step up to help matters when the audio signal is low.  No such luck here, just a huge voltage multiplier with all the issues they have and a pile of parts needed for it to work... or not as it happens.  I built these:

 

avVjVNFh.jpg

 

...and they worked perfectly off a portable headphone amplifier and fit into the palm of your hand.  Me thinks the person responsible for the Verto hasn't got a clue how to do this properly...

 

As for the subject of transformers, it's been well known since the dawn of electrostatics that they didn't match well with transformers.  Look at the history of brands like Sound Lab and Acoustat who spent a lot of time to make the transformers less of a crippling weak link in the performance of the panels.  So many different designs have been attempted over the years but none have truly worked and the inductive nature of transformers and electrostatics don't play well together.  For speakers they are a necessity given the very high voltages (Soundlab are up to what now, 20kV bias) but for headphones we can run on +/-400V and overdrive the transducers so amplifiers are a no-brainer.  

 

A word about just how stupid eric65 really is.  I mean this is epic shit and he just can't figure out how moronic this really is.  His great mod is to bypass the shitty transformers of the Woo WEE as according to him the gain is too high.  Granted 1:50 transformers are a bit too much today and the iron Woo is using is wholly unsuitable for the job so good riddance.    What Eric does though is he drives the Stax directly off the TRS plug on the RKV... wait for it.... single ended that is.  :palm:   - stators are grounded so there is at least that but we are talking about distortion close to the 20% mark and at very low volume.  The theoretical max voltage swing of the RKV is 200Vpp but in reality it will be lower and we all know how great amps are when running right on the limit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've no interest in this transformer box since I already have two SRD-7/SB (mk1 and mk2). Sound is nice, especially with my vintage sets, somewhat foot-tapping because of mids-hump, but it is no match for a basic SRM-1/mk2 pro : details retrieval, extension, soundstage, dynamics, bass tightness, etc...

 

I don't have a clue in electronics, but I'm convinced the amplifier path is the right one for e-stat headphones. At least because Stax driving units are now amps only.

And though the mafia points out some "flaws" (unregulated PSU, overdriven tubes in 007t, no feedback on 727's last stage, etc..), most of them because these units are built to a price point, I do think they are great value for the money. And the build quality is quite there.

 

Last but not least, I'm on the list for a BHSE ( #4 batch), because I'm convinced this is the endgame commercial amp for Stax phones today (and it's amp-pr0n to look at ;D ). And please kill me without mercy whenever I complain about the waiting time.

 

But Birgir, let's face it : this Verto unit didn't work because it was damaged. And it has more likely something to do with the build quality the reviewer points out.

 

Anyway, your little SB boxes are appealing. Could a basic O2 amp feed them ?  :angel:

 

Ali

Edited by Ali-Pacha
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt the verto was damanged, the reviewer just didn't listen loudly enough to energize the bias supply.  Even Eric has said there is no sound for the first two minutes which is not good for the health of the diaphragm. 

 

Those small boxes worked just fine off a Grado RA-1 (normal version) driven by an iphone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

avVjVNFh.jpg

 

 

 

Birgir...you probably wonder the where about of your transformer boxes.  They are actually with me courtesy of Doug.  I'll revisit them again with the SR009.  The SR007 didn't work all that well with them due to its much more difficult to drive nature.

Edited by purk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used to have a SR303 + SRM212. Loved it for female vocals, strings, soft jazz. Not so much for Led, Rush, Purple and fusion. Fast, coherent, but lacked bass presentation. Could not ask too much for such a simple setup, nonetheless, I know.

 

In the end, sold it in order to get some better dynamic phones. But still in love with electrostatics.

 

May I ask something? How about the actual 007 for 60-70 rock and fusion, that I listen most of the time? Does it do a fair job, like presenting a grooving sound, good bass, as in on pair with dynamics?

 

I do not have the time or patience to look for a mint Mk I, since I live in Brazil and to send a used phone to here is so troublesome, not to say expensive, pretty expensive. It would be like go to US in a near future and buy a new one and ship to my hotel.

 

What do you guys think? Birigir, let´s start the season of trashing newer 007 versus older and better 007 Mk I.

 

Many thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.