purk Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 http://www.enjoythemusic.com/superioraudio/ Not a bad review but I wish the reviewer did a better job at reviewing the B-52 as a headphone amp rather than pre-amp. I'm wondering how well does the B-52 handle the R10, Qualia, and L3000. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBLoudG20 Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 heh, where is Kevin? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deepak Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 I wouldn't use it with low impedance headphones. It sounded like ass with the PS-1, the HR-2/PS-1 sounded much better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hYdrociTy Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 And, of course, it is undeniable that blocking out extraneous sounds ? which are always there in my downtown Chicago apartment ? promotes a degree of concentration and focus on the music that is quite different from ordinary listening That's some HD600 he got from ray. Military grade isolation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n_maher Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 Headphones are not normally my choice for listening to music, except of course for iPod/Walkman duty on long trips. I have never cared for the feeling of having something clamped around my earsUh yeah, at this point I think I'll pretty much ignore what this guy has to say about headphones as an audiophile listening experience. The comment about the HD600s providing isolation seals the deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salt Peanuts Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 Kinda opposite of what enjoythemusic.com did when they reviewed Stealth year or so back - the reviewer didn't bother testing it as a preamp since it's output impedance was too high in his book. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin gilmore Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 heh, where is Kevin? Lets see, a one tube preamp. Yeah, great stuff. Gag me with a spoon. $5k+ for a one tube preamp with no remote control and no switching and a noisy switcher for the filament supply. Is that better... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aerius Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 Gag me with a spoon. Valley girl She's a valley girl Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sacd lover Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 I wouldn't use it with low impedance headphones. It sounded like ass with the PS-1, the HR-2/PS-1 sounded much better. I thought the B52 was supposed sound the best ever with PS-1's from the Head-Fi meet reviews. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deepak Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 I thought the B52 was supposed sound the best ever with PS-1's from the Head-Fi meet reviews. If it was I wasn't hearing it, the bass was truly terrible. I thought it sounded much better with the HD600 balanced. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sacd lover Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 If it was I wasn't hearing it, the bass was truly terrible. I thought it sounded much better with the HD600 balanced. That makes more sense given how high KG said the output impedence was. But, I have read more than one post exclaiming how good the PS-1 is with the B52. Didn't Iron Dreamer say that in the one CA meets? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhd812 Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 I thought it sounded much better with the HD600 balanced. out of every headphone I tried this is the match made in heaven. I never heard balanced 701's but at a few meets I was impressed with the 701 and b52 combo. my issue is getting a 701 balanced with a 20ft stock cable, if anyone knows if i could then please point me to the direction. i read the isolation part in terms like "headphones isolate you from the world" instead of actual isolation for the headphones. I have a feeling this is just a start of the reviews for this bad boy, can not wait till Stereophile gets their hands on one. of course the reason is I having the first made production so of course i am interested. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boomana Posted October 2, 2007 Report Share Posted October 2, 2007 I liked the B52/PS1 combo. It was close to a year ago when I heard it, so I'll leave out time-addled impressions, but I've since heard PS1s on systems I liked and didn't like, and I remember liking that one quite a bit. I should have a chance to hear it again in a couple weeks, so I'll see if new impressions match old memories. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philodox Posted October 2, 2007 Report Share Posted October 2, 2007 The PS1 wasn't bad out of the B52 when balanced... certainly not the best combo I've heard, but not hideous. It definitely did a better job with the K340's than the PS1's, but I ultimately preferred my amp. [which also sounds better with the Grados, though again not perfect] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanoha Posted October 2, 2007 Report Share Posted October 2, 2007 That makes more sense given how high KG said the output impedence was. But, I have read more than one post exclaiming how good the PS-1 is with the B52. Didn't Iron Dreamer say that in the one CA meets? What? Iron Dreamer said something good about a RSA product? Oh shit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iron_Dreamer Posted October 2, 2007 Report Share Posted October 2, 2007 LOL I certainly don't recall saying that I liked the B52/PS1. I don't really like the PS1 as it is. Let alone Ray's pair with gawd-awful heavy wiring which makes the headphone even more uncomfortable, and ratshack pads which make it bassier/boomier. I've only listened to the B52 once that I can recall, over a year ago. Nothing great, nothing awful, just a garden-variety balanced amp, and quite an expensive one for what it is. As I owned a Headamp Reference at the time, which certainly sounded better to me, the B52 at 3x+ the price drew little interest from me, other than to oogle at it's hugeness and exposed parts when Ray cracked 'er open. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.