September 21, 200916 yr Laser-Accurate microphone proves once and for all that everything is better with lasers
September 21, 200916 yr You are not trending well. I could take the time to run a full bivariate regression and give you a pleasant r^2, but with such a small n it would hardly be worth it. That's right, igorst, you have a small n, and it's not very pretty so far.
September 22, 200916 yr Sounds a bit like a plasma tweeter in reverse, minus the plasma or the tweeter. A friend of mine was working on a mic that was pretty similar, though the project was stalled by technology limitations at the time. This seems like it's actually feasible though.
September 22, 200916 yr Hmm, its probably an interferometer of some sort. I guess its about time someone tried to apply it on audio.
September 23, 200916 yr Wasn't Joseph Grado working on some fancy schmancy mic as well? It wasn't laser, It was some sort of omnidirectional mic that was supposed to record from thousands of points or something. I'm not going to even kid, I didn't get it. A few things he was saying didn't make sense.
September 23, 200916 yr I suspect it was inspired by El-P. Have you - or anybody we know - actually heard one of these? I remember thinking when it came out that it was a fascinating idea. Then I never heard another word about it.
September 23, 200916 yr Alas, no, but the review I read of it seemed so accurate that I feel I have -- basically, it said that because the virtual needle is so accurate, that it almost seems to exacerbate every single speck of dust and blemish on the record. I.E. the classic "too revealing" review -- still would like to hear one, myself, having heard really well-cleaned vinyl.
September 24, 200916 yr Interesting. Of course ten grand is lot of money for a turntable, or more specifically, more than I have for one. But not wearing out your records and not having to buy new carts every whenever make it seem more reasonable.
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now