Thought it might be useful to have a thread on music related articles clogging the tubes. I'll start with...

When Country Was King: Before Nashville, Southern California Served As Ground Zero For Honky-Tonk - http://ow.ly/5voKi

Nice thread idea, Ric. I think there are a couple good ones lying around to share.

A conversation with Brian Eno: 'We are all singing. We call it speech, but we're singing to each other.' | LATimes http://ow.ly/1un31i

I thought this was a nice little article on Nils Lofgren.

Cool article on Scopitones.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kbv8p1YfJbI

Edited September 23, 201114 yr by blessingx

Does classical music now belong to Asia? http://ow.ly/1xCP5X 

Everything Old: Has pop culture, uh, stopped? http://ow.ly/6ENVM

And...

Nostalgia on Repeat by Chuck Klosterman - Grantland http://ow.ly/1xS639

Speaking of the passage of time...

‘Cassette tape’ kicked out of Oxford English Dictionary http://ow.ly/1yOxgf

[timeline] The Evolution of Western Dance Music http://ow.ly/1zsHpM

Digital Stradivari: computer models of violins reveal master luthier’s techniques

On the previous theme...

You Say You Want a Devolution? http://ow.ly/1BHhZZ  

Love this Chuck Klosterman peice on the new Lou Reed/Metallica album...

"If The Red Hot Chili Peppers acoustically covered the 12 worst Primus songs for Starbucks..." http://ow.ly/7Un4Q

It’s a Steal! How Columbia House Made Money Giving Away Music - http://ow.ly/1COZih  

Interesting blind testing on violins (by professional violinists):

http://www.nytimes.c...tml?ref=science

Strad came in last

Edited January 3, 201214 yr by Dreadhead

Interesting blind testing on violins (by professional violinists):

http://www.nytimes.c...tml?ref=science

Strad came in last

I agree with the critiques in the article. How an instrument sounds under the ear is often very different from how it sounds in a concert hall.

Well I'm guessing they will do that soon enough too... sounds like they have already done it with other listeners. That said I'd bet once they completed that the complaint would be that the hall would have to be full to accurately represent real use etc.

When talking 10-30k (very much a guess on a new high quality violin) vs a 1 million+ strad the ROI isn't looking too hot.

I also think it was interesting because before anyone had done the test I'd bet that the players would have said they could have absolutely tell the difference.

Edited January 3, 201214 yr by Dreadhead

Sorry, my reply wasn't clear. The critiques near the end of the article are the ones that resonated with me:

"“Even experienced players who have not lived with a great violin don’t realize what they are hearing or doing when they first play a great instrument,” he said. “Second, Strads and del Gesùs vary tremendously in sound characteristics and quality, so generalizations are hard to make from a few cases, in any event.”"

Sorry, my reply wasn't clear. The critiques near the end of the article are the ones that resonated with me:

"“Even experienced players who have not lived with a great violin don’t realize what they are hearing or doing when they first play a great instrument,” he said. “Second, Strads and del Gesùs vary tremendously in sound characteristics and quality, so generalizations are hard to make from a few cases, in any event.”"

Yeah. I'm no musician.

That said I do know that "living" with something that you (or your benfactors) paid $1+million for will lead to you finding it's greatness far more than something you got for $20k. That's just straight up human nature. Separating that effect is probably impossible and not even necessarily important I guess. In the end I couldn't care less if the music was produced by a Strad or new made as I'm sure the player has much more to do with what is produced.

The comment about variability is another one that I take issue with because they are invariably expensive. My point being if some are truly better then they should be the only ones that cost lots right? Or is the cost part of what makes them great in that it acts as a "gate" through which only the best of the best get to play them. I'm guessing it's the latter that makes them great.

There is definitely variation in cost even in the highest bracket. But, I don't really need to use that fact. Remember the instrument market isn't dominated by musicians, it's dominated by Asian collectors. They don't play the instruments, they just hoard them.

I meant expensive compared to new build.

I had not thought about your point about the hoarding. I should have. I read an article a few years back about some people were doing deals where the benefactor let the musician play the instrument but had to give them x number of private performances each year etc.

I wish I could play some instrument but my attempt at Viola as an adult was a flop and I just ran out of time too. The local high school was happy with the donation though.

Everyone's hoarding, it's not just the Asians. When you know your purchase will go up in price no matter what, that's a pretty fucking safe investment.

As to sound, I've played on a large variety from stuff worth a few thousand to stuff worth a few million. There's still a correlation, none of the newly made stuff (within the last 20 years) touches the old stuff, in my experience. Of course there is still a value attached due to antiquity.

Edited January 3, 201214 yr by mypasswordis

Japanese collectors drove ukulele prices through the roof.

Not that anyone gives a shit.

I'm considering finding a 19th century Parisian maker, specifically ex-Vuillaume shop, like Hippolyte Silvestre, Jean-Joseph Honoré Derazey, Charles Buthod, Charles-Adolphe Maucotel, Télesphore Barbé or Paul Bailly. I cannot imagine a safer investment. Perhaps in a year or two.

I dunno if I'd go French for violins for the cheaper stuff, but it could work. Definitely try before you buy and make sure to ask to check the condition of the instrument under blacklighting (this applies to all the older instruments).