so billy, you're against 5.1, 7.1, surround sound because you can get just as good sound from a two channel system and you think that the market is just trying to screw with us into spending more money to get "surround" benefits? but the real question is, how much do you have to spend in a two-channel system to get this "experience" that you constantly bring up? some of us don't have that kind of cash sitting around and would rather spend some on a cheaper 5.1 system than dish out for a great two-channel system.