November 29, 200916 yr comment_300777 Ok, I have a 10 year old nephew with a laptop. This was purchased by his IBC mother (my sister) at a pawn shop for cheap, and, of course, without the original XP media. Need I say more? But, I'm stuck getting XP back on it. The machine is not up for Vista, nor Win7 (pity, because I have a spare Vista upgrade), and Linux (Ubutu, etc) just is not an option for the spawn of IBC. So, how do I get a reasonable version of XP? Report
November 29, 200916 yr comment_300951 now now, 'reks, Bill wouldn't like you blasting out VLKs... Report
November 30, 200916 yr comment_301002 My vote is for Irish bean counter although I suspect that Nate might be right. Report
November 30, 200916 yr comment_301035 Well by Shelly's link I've got my money on Intermediate Bulk Container. Report
December 1, 200916 yr comment_301405 If 90% of the specialized software I use wasn't Windows only, I would be Mac-only myself. XP and Vista are maddeningly random in their performance. So far Win 7 is much better, but really too early to tell. Report
December 1, 200916 yr comment_301408 I fucking hate XP Here here It is too bad that there is a lot of Windows only software. Report
December 1, 200916 yr comment_301411 that's what VMs are for. And I may go that route at my next computer replacement at work. I think a maxed out MAC Pro might make a nice little workstation. Report
December 1, 200916 yr comment_301412 XP isn't that bad, and hell it's 7 yrs old now.... Vista got a bad rap due to crappy early driver support and despite ending up as a pretty solid OS was never able to change that early perception. Windows 7 has been very good so far. Report
December 1, 200916 yr comment_301413 XP isn't that bad, and hell it's 7 yrs old now.... Vista got a bad rap due to crappy early driver support and despite ending up as a pretty solid OS was never able to change that early perception. Windows 7 has been very good so far. QFT Report
December 1, 200916 yr comment_301415 The problem with both XP and Vista is it takes a lot of tweaking to get them to be stable and perform well on a regular basis. At least that is my take. In addition Vista does some pretty intrusive shit that also takes up a lot of CPU time and cannot be turned off, at least not easily, without causing cascading problems. On the other hand OS X is not trouble-free either. Report
December 1, 200916 yr comment_301416 The problem with both XP and Vista is it takes a lot of tweaking to get them to be stable and perform well on a regular basis. While I agree about Vista (it's buggy as all hell on my home laptop) I've had nothing but good luck with XP from a stability standpoint with no user interference required. It's still my preferred OS given the software I have to run. OS-X has certainly been more stable on my macbook than any other OS I've run but I also don't mess around with that laptop like I do my other computers. Report
December 1, 200916 yr comment_301422 that's what VMs are for.Yeah, but then you're still running Windows -- just within a VM. Report
December 1, 200916 yr comment_301442 I never agree with these type threads (XP/Windows bashing). Although I do agree that I don't much care for Vista. Report
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.