Well, I have a somewhat different perspective on this. I don't know that "tubes had to become more reliable into the '50s" as prior to that there was no other option. In fact, if improved reliability was a major engineering goal you would think that the tube manufacturers would be putting out advertisements touting it. They didn't. They did promote cheaper 9 pin miniature tubes, e.g. 12A_7 vs. more expensive pre-war octals such as 6SL7 and 6SN7, squeezing more elements into the same tube envelope with compactrons (less tubes, less expense), or putting in controlled filament warm up elements to allow manufacturers to run series filament heaters (less expensive) - do you see a pattern here? The fact is by the 1930s, consumer tubes would last 5-10 years, which was "good enough."
In fact, the major factor for tube reliability is conservative operating conditions, which was understood in the 1930s - the longest running tube was a "Mazda AC/P pentode valve (serial No. 4418) in operation at the BBC's main Northern Ireland transmitter at Lisnagarvey. The valve was in service from 1935 until 1961 and had a recorded life of 232,592 hours." A 1930s tube. In the 1950s, they did introduce premium versions of the 6SL7 (5691) and 6SN7 (5692) tubes which were supposed to have a longer service life. The way they did that is very simple, they just derated the tube so it was supposed to run at lower voltages, currents and power dissipation than its parent tubes. Now, it is true that they made advances in reliability for specialized tubes which were used for trans-Atlantic submarine telephone cable repeaters, but AFAIK that technology never made it to consumer grade tubes - too expensive.
Switching to the other item in your post, would it be possible to show the schematic of the HEV90? The working version, that is.