Jump to content

Dusty Chalk

Moderators
  • Posts

    48,525
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    65

Everything posted by Dusty Chalk

  1. Yes, it went away.
  2. It's doing weird stereo panning things, like the L+R/L-R encoding/decoding thing wasn't set up quite correctly.
  3. I was just checking this thread. (on now) I doubt I'll be able to stay up for the whole thing, will listen to the replay.
  4. I'm not hearing anything.
  5. Apparently, according to one Facebook post, it's National Kiss-a-Ginger day today.
  6. I concur. The power supply is only ever as good as the weakest link. Have you seen that shit that's in your walls? No power cord on earth (vague pun not intended but noticed, acknowledged and allowed) is going to improve on that, short of regenerating.
  7. Some people think wine is the answer to everything. Wine is not the answer, it is the question. 'Yes' is the answer.
  8. Therein lies the problem. I like listening to the basement from upstairs, hadn't heard that in a while.
  9. Ze uploader haz not made zees video available in your country. I just discovered these people, love the juxtaposition of nationalities:
  10. Because they posted a picture of the Orpheus on their Facebook page from their glory days. I forget what they said about it, but it was something like the pinnacle of headphones. No, they shouldn't always have to come out with something moarbetr, and yes, they should wait until they get it right to come out with a product. So I agree with the sentiment. But I am still interested in whatever they come out with next.
  11. My girl, Oh Land: Girl is a bit of an exhibitionist. Is it wrong (and by 'wrong', I mean, anti-feminist) to condone such behavior? So who besides me realized that he'll get the last laugh? "Off with their heads!"
  12. Also check out Nuforce's offerings.
  13. There's some merit to higher sampling rates (contrary to Dan's contrarianism), but yeah, they lose me somewhere around 192 also. For playback, I don't see the point behind more than 96kHz, myself, but when mixing tracks, I understand the necessity of higher resolutions on the individual tracks as long as the mixdown software doesn't waste it -- you don't want to compound rounding errors. I'd have to do the math (which I have no interest in doing) to see what the necessary individual frequencies would need to be to get moar betr sound at the final mixdown. I personally believe it reduces to phase accuracy, but that's just a SWAG.
  14. Maybe you should use something better than gaffer's tape? Aye keed, aye keed. That so fucking sucks. I'd be ready to kick the car to the ... uh ... curb.
  15. It's pretty amazing that nature can produce something that would make you question whether or not it was natural like that. Makes Dusty happy. Of course, now I want Swedish meatballs or equivalent. Literally.
  16. 32/768 has existed in the professional world for a while now, albeit only at the top end when I was still reading about it regularly (over a year ago).
  17. Yeezh, man, at least it waited a day. But still, sympathies, it's in the 20's here.
  18. McIntosh D100?
  19. Air is one of the best insulators, so yes, bubble wrap is a good idea.
  20. Perhaps a response/homage/comic variation of:
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.