Knuckledragger

Srsly. I saw it in theaters and loved it. The DVD is in my "to watch" pile, after The Spirit of St. Louis, and Witness for the Prosecution.

Geez that image is huge. That's what she said.

When does the Numa Numa song start?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZIwQTo973w&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_UeunJLzilU

New 3D model of Wall Street:

Twitter / Jeff: $10 to first person who bu ...

I think Posty owes us some pictures. Moar Quad pron! As an aside, I must confess my Quad pedigree is weak. I use my 99 CDP-2 and 12L Actives all day every day, but I don't own anything vintage or 'static. \

Barely slept at all. Again. I [TMI]'d but I didn't [TMI]. Drove my Subaru for the first time in two weeks. After driving the Golf TDI on the Vineyard, it's like learning how to drive all over again. The Golf's shifter is precise, and the clutch is (reasonably) forgiving. By comparison, the Subie's clutch is a harsh mistress with all the forgiveness of a Japanese dominatrix. OTOH, the 2.5L gas burner is downright peppy compared to the glacial Golf. It's nice to have my car back in driving condition. Now I just to do something about the body work. Right now is lunch time. I think this afternoon I am going to take a nice walk and smoke a cigar + take some pix.

/me sputters. BRB selling my GLite +DPS so I can buy a case of 12.

I own an EF 50mm F/1.4 and an EF 50mm F/1.8 Mk I. The F/1.4 has full time manual (nice) and USM (quiet focusing). It's really sharp when it wants to be (seldom when I want it to be) and has distressing tendency to backfocus. I almost always use my 580EX speedlite and its AF-assist beam when using my 50/1.4. The EF 50mm F/1.8 is noisy and lacks FTM. It does have hard stop infinity focus, which is essential for long exposures in the dark where AF is useless. The Mk I has metal lens mount and a distance scale window. It's construction is very similar to the EF 35mm F/2. It sells on the used market for a lot more than a Mk II, but far less than a 50mm F/1.4. The EF 85mm F/1.8 has a fair amount of CA (chromatic aberration) wide open, but otherwise kicks ass. </lens geek>

Let's see here... First two shots were basically unedited. I set a custom white balance in my camera by using a $4 Chinese knock-off Expodisc. That's why the street lights are such an intense white color. I got the "sun star" effect in the first one by closing down the aperture to F/22 and doing a 30 second exposure. The second shot was done at F/10, IIRC. Third shot was taken with my IR-modified PowerShot G2. Most of what you are seeing is the weirdness of infrared. I did spend quite a bit of time working over the levels and going at with the dodge and burn tools in PS. Level control is very important when working with infrared photos, I find. Shot #4 is again basically no edits. I did some spot-removal, that's all. The final shot is pseudo-HDR made from one RAW exposure in Photomatix, and then cleaned up in Photoshop. HDR gets a bad rap, but I enjoy it in small amounts. I tend to go for "subtle" HDR compared to the over-the-top cartoonishness that plagues so much of the technique.

I have to do about two acres of that. Damn, dude. --- I slept terribly, got up too early, packed up the car, caught a ferry boat, drove across the state, got home, felt like death warmed over under a McDonald's heat lamp, took a two hour now, just woke up and am now getting re-acquainted with my music system. I missed my Quads. Later tonight will be wah wah guitar, but right now it can has be food time please.

How long have you been listening to 'stats anyway? You must have started in high school. ..or whatever is the viking equivalent.

I'm leaving MV tomorro. I haven't taken nearly as many photos as I'd have liked, and edited even fewer [hello dead FireWire port!] That said, here's a few that I did get through: EDIT: Fixed some links. Click through for respective Flickr pages with tags notes and EXIF.